The number, explained.

Freiburg's perfect 100.0 Attack rating (ranked 1st in the Bundesliga, well above the league average of 63.6) is the standout driver of their 78 Overall, offsetting relative weaknesses in Set Pieces (62.5, 10th) and Discipline (66.7, 7th), where they actually fall below their own strong average on other axes.

Manchester City's perfect Form score of 100.0 (ranked 1st in the Premier League, well above the league average of 47.1) is the standout driver elevating their 77.8 Overall, even as their relatively weak Discipline rating of 63.3 (13th, slightly below the league average of 66.4) provides a modest drag on an otherwise dominant cross-axis profile.

Manchester United's perfect 100.0 xG rating — the highest in the Premier League — is the standout driver of their 77.6 Overall, lifting them well above the league average of 50.8 on that axis, even as a relatively weak Defense (60.0, ranked 9th) and poor Form (53.3) prevent an even higher score.

Sheffield Wednesday's perfect xG score of 100.0 — ranking 1st in League One and more than double the league average of 45.2 — is the standout driver of their 77.2 Overall, offsetting their comparatively weak Discipline rating of 63.3 (14th in the league) to produce a profile defined by elite attacking threat creation.

Union St. Gilloise's 77 Overall is driven by elite dominance in Attack (100.0, ranked #1), Defense (86.7, ranked #1), and Form (100.0, ranked #1), but is held back meaningfully by mid-table finishes in xG (53.3, #9), Set Pieces (55.0, #10), and Discipline (66.7, #9), revealing a team that outperforms its underlying expected goals metrics despite leading the league in results and defensive solidity.

Hammarby's perfect xG score of 100.0 — ranking 1st of 16 in Allsvenskan and nearly 45 points above the league average of 55.1 — is the standout driver of their 76.6 Overall, compensating for more modest Attack and Defense ratings of 66.7 that sit closer to mid-table.

Beşiktaş earns a 76.5 Overall despite a mediocre Defense (53.3) and poor Discipline (50.0, ranked #12) by dominating every offensive dimension — ranking #1 in Attack (100.0), Form (80.0), and Set Pieces (95.0), and #2 in xG (80.6) — all well above a league average that tops out at 58.0 across any axis.

Philadelphia Union's 76.1 Overall is anchored by elite scores across Attack (100.0, ranked 1st), Defense (73.3, ranked 1st), and Form (100.0, ranked 1st), but pulled down notably by a middling xG of 53.0 (12th) and a below-league-average Discipline score of 60.0 (21st, vs. the league average of 63.2), preventing an even higher overall despite their dominance in three of six axes.

Rangers's 75.9 Overall is built on elite defensive solidity (93.3, ranked 1st in the league vs. a 58.3 average) and a perfect Form score (100.0, also 1st), which more than compensate for an Attack rating of just 40.0 that sits at mid-table despite their overall dominance.

Mamelodi Sundowns dominate the Premier Soccer League on Attack (86.7, ranked 1st) and Form (86.7, ranked 1st), both towering roughly 47 points above league average, but their xG rating of just 55.3 — the lowest of their six axes and only 18 points above the league mean — acts as a drag that pulls their Overall down to 75.8 despite those elite attacking and form credentials.

PSV's Overall of 75.7 is anchored by maxed-out Attack and xG scores of 100.0 (both ranked 1st in the Eredivisie), but pulled down notably by a Discipline rating of just 56.7, which ranks 17th of 18 teams and sits well below the league average of 72.4, making it the single sharpest weakness in an otherwise dominant profile.

FC Tokyo's 75.5 Overall is driven by a remarkably dominant multi-axis profile, ranking #1 in Defense (100.0 vs. a league average of 57.3), Form (100.0 vs. 54.3), and Set Pieces (91.7 vs. 51.9), which more than compensate for modest Attack (55.6) and Discipline (55.6) scores to produce one of the league's highest averages.

Grimsby's Overall of 75.3 is anchored above all by their Set Pieces rating of 96.9 — the highest in League Two, sitting 37.9 points above the league average of 59.0 — complemented by a strong xG of 93.3 (ranked 4th), together compensating for comparatively modest Defense (60.0) and Attack (66.7) scores.

Ajax's perfect 100.0 Attack rating (ranked 1st in the Eredivisie, versus a league average of 61.1) is the standout driver of their 75.2 Overall, though their relatively weak Defense (53.3, ranked 4th) and poor Discipline (62.5, ranked 14th) prevent an even higher score despite elite Set Pieces (97.5) and solid xG (71.0).

Vasco da Gama's perfect xG score of 100.0 (ranked 1st of 20) combined with an elite Defense rating of 86.7 (also ranked 1st) drives their 75.2 Overall, as both axes sit dramatically above league averages of 49.1 and 51.3 respectively, compensating for more modest Attack and Discipline scores of 60.0.

FC Midtjylland's perfect 100.0 Attack rating — the league's best by a wide margin above the 63.3 average — is the dominant force lifting their 75.1 Overall, even as a relatively modest 56.3 in Set Pieces and 62.5 in Discipline (8th in the league) prevent the score from climbing higher.

Celtic's perfect Set Pieces score of 100.0 (ranked 1st in the Premiership, well above the league average of 75.1) anchors their 74.9 Overall, complemented by a near-perfect xG of 95.7 that exposes a notable gap with their relatively modest Attack rating of 46.7 — suggesting their chance creation far outpaces their finishing-based attack score.

Molde's perfect 100.0 Attack rating — the league's highest by a wide margin above the 61.2 average — is the single biggest driver of their 74.8 Overall, compensating for a comparatively modest xG of 57.7 that actually sits below the league average of 59.6 and ranks only 8th, suggesting their attack rating reflects volume or efficiency metrics beyond raw expected goals.

Augsburg's Overall of 74.8 is driven primarily by an elite xG rating of 100.0 — the highest in the Bundesliga — paired with a #3-ranked Attack of 91.7, signaling exceptional chance creation and finishing quality that more than compensates for a relatively modest Defense score of 50.0.

Panathinaikos dominates five of six axes — ranking #1 in Attack (80.0), Defense (86.7), Form (100.0), and #2 in Set Pieces (87.5) — but their xG of just 36.3 ranks #8 of 14 and actually falls below the league average of 39.5, making it the sole weak point that pulls their Overall down to 74.5 despite elite performance everywhere else.

Wolves's xG rating of 88.7 stands 36.4 points above the Championship average of 52.3 and is their single highest axis score, anchoring an Overall of 74.4 that is lifted substantially by elite-tier performances across xG, Set Pieces (87.5), and Discipline (83.3), even as their Defense (53.3) sits near the league mean and represents their clearest weak point.

Roma's profile is remarkably balanced across all six axes, but their xG rating of 77.2 — the highest in Serie A and the only metric that meaningfully separates itself from their otherwise uniform 73.3 scores — is the primary driver lifting their Overall to 74.2, reflecting a team whose expected goal generation stands out even within an already elite attacking profile.

Dinamo Bucuresti's 74.2 Overall is anchored by elite Attack (93.3, ranked 1st) and Form (86.7, ranked 1st) ratings that far exceed the league averages of 52.5 and 51.3 respectively, though their Discipline score of 54.2 (ranked 13th of 16, well below the league average of 65.2) is the clear weak link dragging the average down.

Salzburg's 74.1 Overall is anchored by dominant performances across Attack (93.3, ranked 1st), Defense (80.0, ranked 1st), and Form (86.7, ranked 1st) — all far above league averages — but is pulled down significantly by their xG (57.0, 6th) and Set Pieces (57.5, 7th) ratings, which fall below even the league average in Set Pieces (63.2), preventing a higher overall score despite their clear superiority in most areas.

Al Ahly's Set Pieces rating of 90.0 is their single highest axis score and sits 33.5 points above the league average of 56.5 (ranking 2nd of 20), making it the clearest driver elevating their Overall to 73.7 alongside strong Form (86.7) and Defense (80.0) that similarly outpace the league by wide margins.

Feyenoord's perfect 100.0 Attack rating (ranked 1st in the Eredivisie, versus a league average of 58.5) is the standout driver of their 73.6 Overall, though their relatively weak Defense score of 46.7 prevents an even higher mark despite top-two finishes in Form, xG, and Discipline as well.

Al Ain's 73.4 Overall is anchored by dominant rankings across nearly every axis — first in Attack (80.0), Form (86.7), and xG (50.0), and second in both Defense (80.0) and Set Pieces (68.8) — but their score is modestly held back by an xG of just 50.0, which despite ranking first in the league, remains the clear weak point in an otherwise elite profile.

Inter's Overall of 70.6 is driven by dominant attacking metrics — ranking 1st in the league in Attack (80.0 vs. a 47.1 average), xG (100.0), and Set Pieces (100.0) — but is meaningfully dragged down by a poor Defense rating of 40.0 (14th of 20, below the 50.7 league average) and the worst Discipline score in the league (50.0, ranked 19th vs. a 70.6 average).

Leverkusen's Set Pieces rating of 90.6 is their highest axis by a wide margin and sits 23.6 points above the Bundesliga average of 67.0, making it the standout driver that pulls their Overall score up to 72.4 despite more modest ratings across Attack (80.0), Defense (66.7), Form (66.7), xG (63.5), and Discipline (66.7).

Gais rank #1 in the league across Attack (93.3), Defense (86.7), and xG (100.0), yet their Overall of 72.4 is dragged down significantly by dead-last finishes in both Set Pieces (37.5 vs. a league average of 63.1) and Discipline (50.0 vs. a league average of 74.5), meaning their elite scoring and defensive metrics are substantially offset by their worst-in-league ratings in the two axes where consistent execution and composure matter most.

Shanghai SIPG's Overall of 72.4 is driven most distinctly by their elite standing in Form (73.3, ranked 1st) and Discipline (83.3, ranked 1st) — both well above the league averages of 42.1 and 65.4 respectively — anchoring a profile where their softest axes (Defense 60.0, Attack 66.7) still comfortably clear league norms.

Slavia Praha's Attack rating of 86.7 towers 42.5 points above the Czech Liga average of 44.2 and ranks first in the league, acting as the primary engine behind their 72.1 Overall, even as their relatively modest xG of 56.0 and Discipline of 66.7 — their weakest axis and only a 10th-place ranking — prevent that ceiling from being higher.

FC Sion's 72.1 Overall is driven primarily by an elite Attack (93.3, ranked 2nd in the league) and the best Form in the Super League (86.7, ranked 1st), both standing far above the league averages of 65 and 47.2 respectively, while their relatively weak Defense (60.0) and Discipline (56.7) prevent an even higher score.

Sparta Praha's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating (ranked 1st in the league, well above the 63.0 league average) combined with a league-leading xG of 75.3 against a league average of just 37.8 drives their 72 Overall, establishing their dominance through both structured dead-ball situations and superior expected goal generation.

Guadalajara Chivas's 71.7 Overall is anchored by a dominant Attack rating of 93.3 (ranked #1 in Liga MX, nearly double the league average of 48.6) and top-ranked Discipline at 83.3, but their xG of 48.0—the only axis near league average and their lowest rank at #7—creates a notable gap between their attacking reputation and actual expected-goals output that moderates their overall score.

Bahia's perfect 100.0 xG rating — the highest in Serie A, sitting 52.3 points above the league average of 47.7 — is the standout driver of their 71.7 Overall, reflecting an elite level of attacking threat generation that compensates for notably weaker Defense (53.3, #7) and Discipline (53.3, #11) scores.

Como's xG rating of 90.7 is their most striking individual axis — ranked 1st in Serie A and nearly double the league average of 47 — signalling a level of attacking quality and chance creation that drives their Overall score of 71.2 well above what their more modest Defense (60.0) and Form (60.0) ratings would suggest alone.

Djurgardens IF's 71.2 Overall is pulled down significantly by two glaring weaknesses — Set Pieces (46.9, ranked #14) and Discipline (58.3, ranked #14) — which drag against an otherwise elite profile headlined by top-three finishes in Attack (86.7, #2), Form (80.0, #2), and xG (75.3, #3).

Lask Linz's perfect xG score of 100.0 — the highest in the Bundesliga and 46.1 points above the league average of 53.9 — is the single most distinctive feature of their profile and the primary driver of their 71.1 Overall rating, compensating for a relatively modest Defense (53.3) and the league's weakest area for the club, Form (46.7).

Vissel Kobe's 71.1 Overall is driven by a near-perfect combination of elite Form (100.0, ranked #1) and Discipline (88.9, ranked #1) — both towering well above their own weaker Attack (55.6) and Set Pieces (54.2), and far ahead of the league averages of 54.3 and 62.6 respectively — making them the standout team in the J1 League on the intangibles that sustain consistent performance.

St. Louis City's perfect 100.0 Attack rating (1st of 30 teams, nearly double the league average of 53.3) is the defining feature of their profile, but a relatively weak 40.0 Defense score (20th of 30) drags the Overall down to 71, making them a team whose elite offensive output is significantly undermined by defensive vulnerability.

Plymouth's xG rating of 38.7 ranks just 14th in League One and sits far below their other axes (Attack 80.0, Form 80.0, Discipline 86.7), suggesting they are converting or creating chances at a level their underlying expected goals don't fully support, which tempers their Overall score to 70.9 despite leading the league in both Attack and Form.

Rapid's 70.9 Overall is driven by elite non-attacking strengths, ranking 1st in both Form (86.7) and Set Pieces (81.3) and 2nd in Defense (80.0), which more than compensate for a below-average xG of 46.3 (9th of 16) that reveals a team creating fewer quality chances than their results suggest.

Ceramica Cleopatra's 70.7 Overall is driven by genuine multi-axis strength across the league, but their xG rating of 58.2 (ranked 2nd of 20, against a league average of 38.4) stands out as their most distinctive edge — a 19.8-point gap above the norm that reflects a level of attacking quality and chance creation far beyond most Egyptian Premier League sides, even as their Attack (66.7) and Set Pieces (62.5) remain comparatively their softer scores.

Wolfsburg's perfect 100.0 Attack rating — the highest in the 2. Bundesliga by a significant margin above the league average of 54.4 — drives their 70.6 Overall despite a Defense score of just 46.7 that sits near the league mean, revealing a team built almost entirely on offensive dominance pulling up an otherwise moderate profile.

Southampton's perfect xG score of 100.0 — ranked 1st in the Championship and nearly double the league average of 52.3 — is the single standout driver of their 70.4 Overall, lifting what would otherwise be a solid but unremarkable mid-70s profile into a genuinely elite attacking threat category.

FK Crvena Zvezda's Overall of 70.3 is driven primarily by elite Defense (86.7, ranked 1st in the league against a league average of 50.0) and Form (86.7, also 1st in the league), which compensate for a comparatively modest Attack rating of 53.3 that sits only 6th in the Super Liga.

Flamengo's Set Pieces rating of 97.5 — the highest single axis score in their profile and 31 points above the league average of 66.5 — is the clearest driver of their 70.2 Overall, offsetting their weakest axis, Discipline (46.7, ranked 15th in Serie A), to pull the average upward alongside elite Form (86.7, #1 in the league).

Vojvodina dominate nearly every performance axis — ranking 1st or 2nd in the league on Attack (80.0), Defense (73.3), Form (86.7), and xG (88.2) — but their Overall of 70.2 is pulled down significantly by Set Pieces (46.9, 8th) and Discipline (45.8, 11th), both of which sit well below the league average and offset what would otherwise be an even higher score.

Sirius's 70.1 Overall is driven primarily by an elite defensive record of 86.7, which ranks 1st in Allsvenskan and sits 24.6 points above the league average of 62.1, more than compensating for a below-average Attack rating of 46.7 that sits 8th in the division.

Železničar Pančevo's perfect 100.0 xG rating — the highest in the Super Liga, nearly double the league average of 53.8 — is the standout driver of their 70 Overall, compensating for a relatively modest Defense (60.0, ranked 7th) and the league's weakest axis for them, Discipline (53.3).

Brighton's perfect Attack score of 100.0 — ranking 1st in the Premier League against a league average of just 47.9 — is the dominant force lifting their Overall to 69.9, even as their xG of 47.0 (11th in the league, below the 50.7 average) suggests their attacking output by other measures is more modest, creating a profile where elite attack ratings carry a relatively uneven set of underlying numbers.

Malmö's strongest individual contributor to their 69.8 Overall is their Set Pieces rating of 78.1, which ranks 3rd in Allsvenskan and sits 15 points above the league average of 63.1, making it the axis that most clearly elevates them above the competition across their profile.

Pyramids FC's 69.8 Overall is anchored by dominant rankings in Attack (73.3, #1), Defense (86.7, #1), Form (100.0, #1), and Set Pieces (91.7, #2), but is significantly dragged down by an xG of just 17.0 (#18 of 20) and Discipline of 50.0 (#17 of 20), both well below the league averages of 38.3 and 66.6 respectively, preventing an even higher Overall despite their supremacy across most other axes.

Walsall's perfect 100.0 xG rating — the highest in League Two and nearly double the league average of 51.8 — is the clearest driver of their 69.8 Overall, compensating for an Attack score of just 46.7 that suggests their chance creation hasn't yet translated into goals.

Olympiakos's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating (ranked 1st in the league, well above the 51.5 average) combines with a league-leading xG of 70.5 to compensate for their surprisingly weak Attack score of 33.3, collectively lifting their Overall to 69.5 despite that glaring offensive underperformance.

AZ Alkmaar's profile is most distinguished by its Defense rating of 60.0, which ranks 2nd in the Eredivisie against a league average of just 32.2 — the largest gap between AZ's score and the league mean across all six axes — and this defensive solidity, combined with a strong Set Pieces rating of 80.0 (4th in the league), anchors their Overall score of 69.5 well above the Eredivisie norm.

Fenerbahçe's perfect xG score of 100.0 (ranked 1st of 18, against a league average of 46.1) anchors their 69.4 Overall, but their relatively weak Form (53.3, 8th), Set Pieces (53.1, 11th), and Discipline (50.0, 13th) — all below the league average for Discipline (60.0) and Set Pieces (56.5) — drag the simple average down considerably from what their elite Attack (80.0, 2nd) and Defense (80.0, 2nd) might otherwise suggest.

Al-Qadisiyah FC's Overall of 69.2 is anchored by elite attacking output — ranking 1st in Attack (86.7 vs. league average 44.1), 1st in Form (86.7), and 2nd in xG (82.0) — but is dragged down significantly by a last-place Discipline rating of 50.0 (vs. league average 66.2), the sharpest internal weakness in an otherwise dominant offensive profile.

Juventus's 69.1 Overall is anchored by elite rankings in Attack (80.0, #1) and Set Pieces (75.0, #1) against a league average of 44.6 and 56.3 respectively, but is meaningfully dragged down by an xG of just 43.1 (#11 of 19), which sits below the league average of 46.8 and signals that their underlying chance creation is far weaker than their attacking output rating suggests.

Hearts' perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating — the highest in the Premiership against a league average of 75.1 — pairs with a league-leading Attack score of 60.0 (against a league average of just 40.0) to drive their 69.1 Overall, offsetting a mid-table xG of 57.0 that ranks only 7th.

Club America's 69.1 Overall is driven by a consistently elite multi-axis profile — Attack (80.0, 3rd), Set Pieces (82.5, 4th), and Discipline (80.0, 2nd) all sit well above league averages of 48.6, 70.6, and 61.8 respectively — while their Defense (53.3, 8th) is the clear weak link, actually trailing the league average of 54.1 and preventing an even higher Overall score.

Slovan Liberec's Overall of 68.7 is driven primarily by an elite Defense rating of 93.3 (ranked 1st in the league, nearly 39 points above the Czech Liga average of 54.6) and top-ranked Form at 86.7, which together compensate for a relatively modest Attack of 53.3 and a low xG of 44.2, painting a picture of a defensively dominant, results-efficient side.

Novorizontino's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating — ranking 1st in Serie B against a league average of just 60.9 — is the standout driver of their 68.7 Overall, complemented by a top-ranked Attack score of 66.7 that together lift the team well clear of the league norm across multiple axes.

West Ham's 68.7 Overall is anchored by dominant Attack (100.0, ranked 1st) and Form (86.7, ranked 1st) ratings, but dragged down significantly by an xG of just 29.7 (ranked 20th of 24) — well below the league average of 52.3 — suggesting their strong attacking reputation and results are not yet backed by underlying expected goals production.

Maccabi Tel Aviv's Overall of 68.6 is anchored by a dominant Attack rating of 93.3 (ranked 1st in the league, nearly double the league average of 49.5) paired with top-ranked Form (86.7) and xG (50.0, also 1st), but is pulled down significantly by a Defense of 66.7 and a Set Pieces score of 56.3 (7th of 14, barely above the league average of 56.0), revealing a team whose elite attacking output far outpaces its defensive and set-piece contributions.

Wuhan Three Towns' Overall of 68.6 is driven almost entirely by historic dominance in two axes — a perfect 100.0 xG (ranked #1 in the league, nearly double the 52.4 league average) and a 93.8 Set Pieces rating (also #1, well above the 65.7 league average) — which offset a weak 40.0 Form (#11) and a below-average 46.7 Defense to produce a well-above-average composite score.

Fortaleza's 68.6 Overall is driven by an exceptional combination of elite Defense (80.0, ranked 1st in the league against an average of 56.7) and a league-leading xG of 89.7 (ranked 3rd, against an average of 43.7), which compensate for a below-average Attack rating of 40.0 that ranks just 11th — suggesting a team that creates high-quality chances and suppresses opponents effectively, even if raw attacking output remains modest.

Real Betis's 68.4 Overall is driven primarily by an elite defensive and disciplinary profile — ranking 2nd in Defense (73.3 vs. a league average of 46.3) and 3rd in Discipline (73.3 vs. 59.5) — while their Attack (53.3, 8th) is the clear weak point that keeps the overall score from climbing higher.

Middlesbrough's xG rating of 85.0 is by far their highest individual axis score and ranks 4th in the Championship against a league average of just 52.3, reflecting elite chance creation that anchors their 68.3 Overall despite a notably weak Defense rating of 46.7 that ranks only 15th and drags well below their own averages elsewhere.

Rapid Vienna's 68.1 Overall is driven by elite across-the-board rankings — top-3 in all six axes — but their xG of 79.0 stands out as their single highest rating, sitting 25.1 points above the league average of 53.9 and signaling that their attacking threat goes even deeper than their already impressive Attack rating of 73.3 suggests.

Real Madrid's xG rating of 87.3 is their highest axis score by a wide margin and ranks 2nd in La Liga against a league average of just 47.2, making their exceptional chance creation the primary driver lifting their Overall to 68 despite a relatively modest Defense score of 53.3.

AmaZulu's Overall 68 is driven primarily by three elite-tier metrics — a league-best xG of 72.7 (ranked 1st), Discipline of 91.7 (ranked 2nd), and Form of 80.0 (ranked 3rd) — which more than offset their weak Set Pieces (50.0, ranked 13th) and below-average Attack (53.3), pulling the simple average up to a comfortably above-league-norm result.

Hajduk Split's Overall of 67.9 is driven by dominant league-wide rankings — first in Attack (66.7), Defense (66.7), and Form (80.0), all well above HNL averages of 46, 48, and 42 respectively — with Form standing out as the single highest axis on the team's own profile, reflecting current momentum that elevates an already league-leading side.

Daejeon Citizen's Overall of 67.9 is anchored by elite attacking output and form — ranking 1st in the league in both Attack (80.0 vs. a league average of 43.3) and Form (73.3 vs. 43.3) — but is meaningfully dragged down by an xG of just 46.7, the lowest in K League 1 (12th of 12), suggesting their finishing has been outpacing the quality of chances they're actually creating.

Bodo/Glimt's Overall of 67.9 is anchored by elite xG (94.0, 3rd in Eliteserien vs. a league average of 59.6) and Set Pieces (90.0, 2nd vs. a league average of 69.5), but their Defense rating of just 20.0 — 13th of 16 and half the league average of 40.0 — is the single sharpest drag on what would otherwise be a significantly higher score.

Start's xG rating of 100.0 is the highest in Eliteserien and sits 40+ points above their next-best axes, single-handedly lifting their Overall to 67.9 despite a below-average Defense of 46.7 and a Discipline score of 62.5 that ranks just 11th in the league.

Castellón ranks in the top 4 of 22 clubs on five of six axes — including #1 in Attack (73.3) and #2 in both Defense (86.7) and Form (86.7) — but their xG rating of just 21.7 (ranked #20 of 22, against a league average of 41.5) drags their Overall down to 67.8, masking what is otherwise one of the strongest all-round profiles in Segunda División.

Swansea's perfect xG score of 100.0 — the best in the Championship and nearly double the league average of 52.3 — is the primary driver of their 67.7 Overall, compensating for a Set Pieces rating of just 42.5 that ranks 23rd of 24 teams.

Al Hilal Omdurman's Overall of 67.6 is anchored by perfect 100.0 scores in both Defense and Form — ranking #1 in the CAF Champions League on both axes and sitting well above the league averages of 82.0 and 59.7 respectively — while their remaining four axes all sit at or below 55.6, preventing a higher Overall despite those elite peaks.

MC Alger's perfect 100.0 Defense rating — 28.9 points above the CAF Champions League average of 71.1 — is their most extreme individual axis and, combined with a competition-leading 77.8 in Attack, anchors an Overall of 67.6 that is pulled down only by the three mid-table 50.0 scores in xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline.

PSG's Overall of 67.6 is anchored by dominant showings in Attack (80.0, ranked #1) and Discipline (83.3, ranked #1), but is meaningfully dragged down by an xG rating of just 48.0 — ranking a surprising #11 of 18, actually below the league average of 58.4 — suggesting their attacking output isn't translating into the expected goals numbers that would push their Overall significantly higher.

Paris FC's 67.6 Overall is anchored by a league-leading Defense rating of 80.0 — 29 points above the Ligue 1 average of 50.9 — though their Set Pieces rating of 41.7 (ranked #14 of 18, well below the league average of 60.5) drags the average down and prevents an even higher Overall score.

Monaco's elite Form (86.7, ranked 1st in Ligue 1) and strong Attack and Defense (both 73.3, ranked 2nd and 3rd respectively) drive their 67.5 Overall, but their Set Pieces rating of just 43.8 — ranking 13th in the league against a league average of 60.6 — is a significant drag that prevents their overall score from reflecting their dominance in those other key areas.

Dundee Utd's perfect xG score of 100.0 (ranked 1st in the league, versus a league average of 56.2) is the dominant driver of their 67.5 Overall, compensating for a below-average Form rating of 46.7 and a weak Discipline score of 54.2 that ranks 10th of 12.

Toluca's Overall of 67.4 is anchored by elite Attack (93.3, ranked #1 in Liga MX) and Form (80.0, also #1), but dragged down significantly by a below-average xG of 49.0 and a poor Discipline score of 50.0 (ranked #14 of 17), revealing a team that dominates on results and output metrics while struggling with underlying efficiency and off-ball conduct.

El Paso's Overall of 67.2 is anchored by a perfect Form score of 100.0 — nearly 58 points above the league average of 41.9 and ranked #1 of 25 — combined with elite Attack (80.0, #2) and Defense (73.3, #2) ratings that together lift the club well clear of the field despite mid-table scores across xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline.

Dortmund's Overall of 67.2 is lifted by elite Form (100.0, ranked #1) and strong Defense (73.3, ranked #2), but dragged down significantly by the worst Discipline in the league (45.8, ranked #18 of 18) and below-average xG (51.0, ranked #10) and Set Pieces (53.1, ranked #12), pulling the simple average well below what their top-end axes alone would suggest.

Kawasaki Frontale's 67.2 Overall is driven primarily by their Attack (77.8 vs. the league average of 52.3) and Form (77.8 vs. 54.3), both ranking 3rd in the J1 League, while their relatively weak Defense (55.6, 5th) and low xG (50.0) temper what would otherwise be a higher score.

Leipzig's perfect 100.0 xG rating — ranking 1st in the Bundesliga, well above the league average of 56.7 — is the standout driver of their 67.1 Overall, compensating for a below-average Form score of 40.0 and a Defense score of 40.0 that rank just 9th and 11th respectively.

Al Sadd's perfect scores in Attack (100.0, ranked 1st) and Discipline (100.0, ranked 1st) drive their Overall to 66.8, but a below-average Defense (33.3, ranked 6th) and weak Set Pieces (37.5, ranked 9th) prevent those elite strengths from translating into a higher composite rating.

Lyon's 66.7 Overall is anchored by an elite defensive record (80.0, ranked 1st in Ligue 1) and strong form (73.3, 2nd in Ligue 1), but held back by a notably weak xG of 50.3 — the only axis where they rank below the league average (59.4) and fall all the way to 12th — revealing a team that wins and defends well but consistently underperforms in expected attacking output.

Górnik Zabrze's 66.7 Overall is held back from elite territory by glaring weaknesses in Set Pieces (46.9, ranked 14th) and Discipline (50.0, ranked 16th), even as the club ranks 1st in the league in Defense (86.7), Form (86.7), and xG (83.3) — a rare combination of dominance on three axes that nonetheless can't fully compensate for finishing near the bottom of the league on two others.

Monterrey's perfect 100.0 set pieces rating — the highest in Liga MX and 29.4 points above the league average of 70.6 — is the single most extreme value in their profile and provides a significant boost that lifts their Overall to 66.4 despite a modest Attack of 53.3 and a below-average Form of 46.7.

Inter Miami's 66.4 Overall is anchored by elite attacking production — a league-best xG rating of 100.0 and an Attack rating of 93.3 (3rd in MLS) — but dragged down sharply by a Discipline score of just 45.8 (29th of 30), nearly 17 points below the league average of 63.2, creating a wide internal imbalance that prevents their offensive dominance from translating into a higher Overall.

Lazio's Overall of 66.3 is driven primarily by an elite Form rating of 86.7 (ranked 1st in Serie A, nearly double the league average of 43.7) combined with a Defense of 80.0 (2nd in the league), which offset a relatively weak Attack (53.3) and xG (49.2) that sit near the league median.

Stoke's Overall of 66.3 is held back primarily by their xG rating of just 27.7, which ranks 21st of 24 in the Championship and sits dramatically below the league average of 52.3, offsetting their elite rankings in Defense (1st, 80.0) and Form (1st, 86.7).

Auckland City's perfect Form score of 100 (against a league average of just 44.8) and league-leading Defense rating of 66.7 (versus the league average of 40.8) are the primary drivers lifting their Overall to 66.1, compensating for the drag of mid-table xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline scores all sitting at 50.0.

WSG Wattens's Overall of 66 is lifted well above their modest Attack (46.7), Defense (46.7), and Form (46.7) scores by an exceptional Set Pieces rating of 93.8 (ranked #1 in the league, versus a league average of 63.2) and a strong xG of 87.3 (ranked #2, versus a league average of 53.9), meaning their ability to create high-quality chances and exploit dead-ball situations compensates for otherwise mid-table performances.

Rosenborg's league-leading Attack (100.0) and Discipline (87.5) are dramatically undermined by an xG of just 31.3 — 13th in the league against a league average of 59.6 — suggesting their attacking output isn't translating into genuine goal-scoring chances, which drags their Overall down to 65.9 despite topping three individual categories.

Al-Ittihad's Overall of 65.8 is driven primarily by elite defensive solidity (73.3, ranked 2nd in the league and 19.6 points above the league average of 53.7), which compensates for an Attack rating of 53.3 that, despite ranking 5th, remains the team's weakest axis by a clear margin.

Uta Arad's Overall of 65.6 is held back despite a league-leading Attack rating of 93.3 — nearly 41 points above the Liga I average of 52.5 — by a striking xG of just 34.0, which ranks 11th in the league and sits 13.9 points below the league average of 47.9, suggesting their attack generates far fewer high-quality chances than their rating implies and dragging the simple average down considerably.

Gent's 65.4 Overall is driven primarily by elite Form (86.7, 2nd in the league) and strong Defense (80.0, 3rd), which more than compensate for a below-average Discipline score of 53.3 that ranks just 15th of 18 teams.

Porto's Overall of 65.4 is anchored primarily by their elite Set Pieces (75.0, 2nd in the league) and Discipline (75.0, also 2nd), both sitting well above the league averages of 51.9 and 59.9 respectively, while their relatively low xG rating of 49.0 — despite ranking 4th — prevents the score from climbing higher.

Palermo's Overall of 65.4 is driven primarily by elite Form (86.7, ranked 1st in Serie B vs. a league average of 45.7) and Attack (66.7, also ranked 1st vs. a league average of 44), which more than offset below-average Set Pieces (55.0, ranked 14th vs. a league average of 62.2).

River Plate's Overall of 65.3 is anchored by elite rankings in xG (81.3, #1 of 29) and Discipline (83.3, #1 of 29), but dragged down significantly by a Set Pieces rating of just 40.6 (#21 of 29) — well below the league average of 54.5 — and a weak Defense score of 53.3 (#18 of 29), preventing what would otherwise be a much higher overall mark.

Rennes's Overall of 65.3 is driven primarily by a standout xG rating of 82.3 (4th in Ligue 1, well above the league average of 59.4), which compensates for a notably weak Attack rating of 40.0 (13th in the league), suggesting the team creates high-quality chances but struggles to convert them into results reflected in traditional attacking output.

Charleroi's profile is driven by elite Attack (73.3, 4th), Defense (60.0, 4th), and especially Form (80.0, 3rd) ratings that sit well above league averages, but their Set Pieces score of 50.0 ranks just 13th of 18 — nearly 12 points below the league average of 61.8 — acting as the clearest drag on an Overall of 65.1 that would otherwise reflect their top-four standing in most other categories.

Wisła Kraków's Overall 65 is dragged down primarily by their xG rating of 41.7 — ranked just 13th of 18 in the league and well below the league average of 49.6 — which stands in stark contrast to their elite Attack (60.0, 2nd), Defense (73.3, 3rd), and Form (73.3, 2nd) ratings, suggesting the team earns results and creates chances in conventional metrics but generates relatively poor expected goals quality.

Boca Juniors's 64.9 Overall is driven by elite rankings across Attack (#3), Defense (#3), xG (#3), and especially Form (#1 with 73.3 against a league average of 44.4), but their Set Pieces score of 52.5 — actually below the league average of 54.7 and ranking #15 of 29 — is the one axis where they fail to match their otherwise top-tier profile, preventing a higher ceiling.

Nürnberg's Overall of 64.9 is pulled up by elite Attack (86.7, 3rd) and Form (86.7, 2nd) but meaningfully dragged down by a very low xG rating of 40.3 (13th), which sits 15.6 points below the league average of 55.9 and signals that their strong results may be outpacing their underlying expected-goals output.

Reading's xG rating of 30.0 ranks just 17th in League One and sits far below their own Attack (73.3) and Defense (80.0) marks, suggesting their strong results are not backed by expected-goals metrics, which drags their Overall down to 64.9 despite elite rankings in attack and defense.

Sporting CP's 64.8 Overall is built on elite across-the-board production — ranking 2nd, 3rd, and 2nd in Attack (80.0), xG (55.3), and Form (73.3) respectively — but their Discipline score of 46.7 (15th of 18, well below the league average of 59.9) is the single most distinctive drag on an otherwise top-tier profile, pulling the simple average meaningfully below what their offensive and form numbers alone would suggest.

Fredrikstad's Overall of 64.7 is driven by two dominant strengths—a league-best xG rating of 100.0 and a league-best Defense rating of 66.7 (ranked #1 in both)—which offset weaker Set Pieces (56.3, #12) and Discipline (58.3, #12) scores to lift the club well above the league's 40.0 defensive average and 59.6 xG average.

Lugano's Overall of 64.6 is heavily dragged down by ranking last in the league on both xG (22.3 vs. a league average of 58.9) and Discipline (36.7 vs. 56.4), offsetting an otherwise elite profile that includes the league's top Defense (73.3) and Form (86.7) and a near-top Attack (93.3).

Universitatea Cluj's Overall of 64.5 is driven primarily by their league-leading xG rating of 76.7 — nearly 29 points above the Liga I average of 47.9 and ranking 1st of 16 — which more than compensates for middling Attack (53.3, 8th) and Defense (53.3, 9th) scores that alone would suggest a far more ordinary side.

Nashville SC's defining trait is their elite defense, rated 73.3 and ranked 1st of 30 MLS teams — a full 27.1 points above the league average of 46.2 — which anchors their 64.5 Overall despite a notably weaker Form rating of 53.3 that holds the ceiling down.

Zulte Waregem's xG rating of 87.3 — the league's 3rd-highest and a full 33 points above the Jupiler Pro League average of 54.4 — is the standout pillar of their profile, single-handedly pulling their Overall to 64.4 despite a modest Attack score of 53.3 and a below-average Form of 46.7.

CFR Cluj's Overall of 64.3 is lifted primarily by their xG rating of 67.3 (3rd in Liga I, well above the league average of 47.9), reflecting genuine attacking threat that reinforces their strong Attack (66.7, 4th) and Form (66.7, 5th) scores, while their relatively weak Defense (53.3, 9th) and Set Pieces (54.2, 11th) prevent a higher ceiling.

Londrina's Set Pieces rating of 87.5 — second-best in Serie B and 26.1 points above the league average of 61.4 — is their most distinctive axis and, combined with a league-leading Attack rating of 66.7, lifts their Overall to 64.3 despite a middling Form score of 46.7 that keeps the ceiling in check.

FC Dallas's 64.2 Overall is driven by genuine strength across Attack (73.3, #7), Form (73.3, #3), Set Pieces (75.0, #5), and Discipline (70.8, #6), but their Defense (46.7, #17) and xG (46.0, #15) sit well below their own averages on those other axes, creating a profile where elite surface-level output and recent form mask underwhelming underlying efficiency and defensive solidity.

Dynamo's Overall of 64.1 is anchored by elite Defense (86.7, #1 in the league) and perfect Form (100.0, #1), but dragged sharply downward by an xG rating of just 29.7 — dead last in the Premier League and nearly 23 points below the league average — revealing a team that wins and defends brilliantly while generating far less expected attacking threat than their results suggest.

Kashiwa Reysol's 64.1 Overall is defined by a stark internal contradiction: their Attack (88.9, #2 in the league) and Set Pieces (79.2, #2) are elite, yet their Defense sits at just 33.3 (#10 of 11, well below the league average of 57.3), single-handedly dragging the average down and preventing a much higher Overall score.

Elfsborg's 64 Overall is built almost entirely on off-ball strengths rather than attacking output: their Discipline (83.3, 3rd in the league vs. a 74.5 average) and Defense (73.3, above the 62.1 league average) prop up the score, while their xG of 46.7 ranks just 11th of 16 and sits well below the league average of 55.1, exposing a genuine lack of attacking threat that keeps the Overall from climbing higher.

BSC Young Boys's Overall 64 reflects a profile pulled in opposite directions: a perfect 100 Attack rating (ranked 1st in the league, 35 points above the league average of 65) is severely undermined by a Defense rating of just 20 (ranked 10th of 12, well below the league average of 36.7), leaving the overall average dragged toward the mid-60s despite elite attacking output.

Stockport's Overall of 64 is driven by elite Attack (80.0, ranked 1st in League One) and strong Set Pieces (80.0, 3rd) and Discipline (79.2, 4th), but pulled down significantly by a weak Defense (53.3, 10th) and poor Form (46.7, 11th) that prevent those attacking strengths from translating into a higher composite score.

Oldham's Overall of 64 is propped up almost entirely by elite non-attacking metrics — a league-high xG of 96.7 (ranked 3rd), Set Pieces of 90.6 (ranked 2nd), and Discipline of 83.3 (ranked 2nd) — which offset severely weak Attack (33.3, 15th) and Form (26.7, 20th) scores that reflect how little those underlying advantages are currently translating into results.

Magdeburg's Overall of 63.9 is anchored by a league-leading Defense rating of 80.0 — 34.8 points above the 2. Bundesliga average of 45.2 — but is meaningfully dragged down by a bottom-third xG of 42.5 (ranked #12) and poor Discipline of 44.4 (ranked #14), creating a profile where elite defensive solidity coexists with genuine attacking inefficiency.

Colombe's perfect 100.0 Defense rating — the highest in the CAF Champions League and 21.7 points above the league average of 78.3 — is the standout driver elevating their 63.9 Overall, compensating for more modest scores of 50.0 across xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline.

Barnet's Overall of 63.8 is driven by elite attacking and set-piece output — ranking 1st in Attack (73.3 vs. a league average of 42.8) and 4th in Set Pieces (80.0 vs. 59.0) — but is significantly dragged down by a 20th-place Defense rating of 46.7, well below the league average of 57.2, creating a profile where goal-threat strengths and defensive vulnerability largely define the team's ceiling.

Club Brugge KV's standout trait is their Set Pieces rating of 87.5, which ranks 1st in the league and sits 27.7 points above the league average of 59.8, making it by far their highest individual axis and the clearest driver of their 63.8 Overall score, even as their Discipline rating of 50.0 (ranked 15th) provides a meaningful drag on that average.

Anderlecht's Overall of 63.8 is driven almost entirely by their Defense rating of 86.7 — ranked #1 in the league and 36 points above the league average of 50.7 — which compensates for a below-average Attack (40.0, #11) and xG (47.7, #11) that would otherwise drag the score significantly lower.

Beijing Guoan's 63.6 Overall is anchored by a standout xG rating of 89.7 (2nd in the league, well above the 52.4 average), reflecting elite attacking threat, but held back significantly by a league-worst Set Pieces score of 45.0 against a league average of 64.3, creating a sharp internal imbalance that suppresses their overall ceiling.

Standard Liege's Overall of 63.4 is driven almost entirely by an elite Discipline rating of 86.7 (ranked 1st in the league, well above the league average of 67.4) and a Set Pieces rating of 85.0 (ranked 2nd), which offset a notably weak xG of 41.8 (ranked 13th, and well below the league average of 54.4), revealing a team that limits mistakes and capitalises on dead-ball situations rather than generating open-play chances.

Mlada Boleslav's 63.4 Overall is anchored by consistently strong rankings across Attack (60.0, #3), Defense (66.7, #3), Form (66.7, #3), and Set Pieces (79.2, #3), but their xG of just 29.7 — ranking #11 of 16 and well below the league average of 37.8 — is a clear outlier that suppresses what would otherwise be an even higher score, suggesting the team creates and converts chances through structured play and set pieces rather than open-play volume.

New England's 63.3 Overall is driven by elite Attack (80.0, 4th in MLS) and Form (80.0, 2nd in MLS) ratings that far outpace the league averages of 53.3 and 43.6 respectively, but those strengths are significantly dragged down by a Set Pieces rating of just 55.0 (25th in MLS, well below the league average of 65.4) and a weak Defense of 53.3 (despite ranking 11th), leaving the club lopsided rather than well-rounded.

Yunnan Yukun's 63.2 Overall is powered by elite marks in Discipline (83.3, ranked 1st in the league) and Attack (80.0, ranked 2nd), but their Defense rating of just 33.3 — well below the league average of 45.0 and ranked 12th — drags the average down significantly, preventing a higher Overall despite their standout offensive and behavioral profile.

St. Truiden's Overall of 63.1 is propped up almost entirely by their perfect xG rating of 100.0 — the highest in the Jupiler Pro League and nearly double the league average of 53.9 — which offsets a weak Defense (46.7, ranked 11th) and the league's worst Form (40.0, ranked 12th).

Liverpool's 62.9 Overall is anchored by an elite Defense rating of 80.0 — the highest in the Premier League and 25 points above the league average of 54.8 — which offsets a below-average Attack of 46.7 and a weak Set Pieces score of 52.5 that ranks just 13th.

Angers's exceptional Set Pieces rating of 95.0 — the third-highest in Ligue 1 and 34.5 points above the league average of 60.5 — is the standout driver lifting their Overall to 62.9 despite a weak Attack score of 40.0 that ranks just 13th of 18.

Mallorca's 62.9 Overall is anchored by an elite defensive foundation (86.7, ranked 2nd in the division versus a league average of 58.5) combined with an exceptional xG rating of 82.3 (also 2nd), which together offset a weak Attack (40.0) and poor Set Pieces (45.0, 16th) to push the club well above mid-table.

Zamalek SC's Overall of 62.8 is dragged down sharply by a Set Pieces rating of just 20.8 (ranked last in the league against a league average of 54.9) and an xG of 24.0 (ranked 16th against a league average of 38.4), which offset what are otherwise elite ratings in Form (100.0, #1), Attack (73.3, #1), and Defense (86.7, #2).

Viborg's Overall of 62.8 is held up primarily by standout performances in Set Pieces (71.9, 2nd in the league vs. a 55.1 average) and Discipline (87.5, 2nd vs. a 66.9 average), which offset middling-to-weak rankings across Attack, Defense, Form, and xG.

Temperley's Overall of 62.8 is anchored by an exceptional Form rating of 86.7 (ranked 1st in the league against an average of 45.2) and a league-leading Attack of 60.0 against a league mean of just 31.3, making those two axes the clearest drivers lifting the club above a mid-table score despite Defense (80.0) being their only axis where another team ranks higher.

Polessya's Overall of 62.8 is anchored by elite defensive and form ratings (both 80.0, ranking 1st in the league) that comfortably offset their comparatively weaker xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline scores (all 50.0), while their Attack of 66.7 — second-best in a league where the average is just 36.3 — confirms this is a well-rounded side pulling its average up from a low-baseline division.

Saint Etienne's Overall of 62.8 is anchored by a league-leading Attack rating of 86.7 — nearly double the Ligue 2 average of 45.9 — but is dragged down significantly by a below-average Set Pieces score of 53.1 (ranked 11th) and a mid-table Defense of 53.3 (ranked 9th), creating a profile where elite attacking output cannot fully compensate for weakness in those supporting axes.

Salford City's Overall of 62.7 is driven by an unusually well-rounded non-attacking profile — ranking 2nd in Form (66.7), 3rd in Set Pieces (85.0), and 4th in both Defense (66.7) and Discipline (80.0) — but is dragged down significantly by a 20th-place xG rating of 31.0, nearly 21 points below the league average of 51.8, exposing a team that wins through structure and dead balls rather than open-play chance creation.

St. Gallen's Overall of 62.7 is propped up almost entirely by elite ratings in Set Pieces (100.0, ranked 1st in the league) and xG (96.0, ranked 2nd), which offset genuinely weak Attack (40.0, 10th) and Defense (33.3) scores that would otherwise drag the club far lower.

Legia Warszawa's Overall 62.5 is driven primarily by their standout Attack rating of 60.0 (ranked 2nd in the league against a league average of 47.4), which compensates for their relatively weak Set Pieces score of 59.4 — actually their lowest axis and below the league average of 63.0, making it the one area where they fall behind the typical Ekstraklasa side despite leading in most others.

ABM Galaxy's perfect 100.0 Attack rating — 43 points above the OFC Champions League average of 57 — is the defining feature of their profile, single-handedly lifting their Overall to 62.5 despite four other axes sitting at a modest 50.0.

Chelsea's xG of 86.2 (2nd in the league) and Set Pieces rating of 85.0 (2nd in the league) signal genuine attacking threat, but their Defense rating of 20.0 — dead last in the Premier League against a league average of 54.5 — drags the overall average down to 62.4, masking what would otherwise be an elite offensive profile.

Bristol Rovers's perfect xG score of 100.0 — ranked 1st in League Two against a league average of 51.8 — is the single biggest driver lifting their Overall to 62.4, compensating for an Attack rating of just 33.3 that ranks 15th, a split suggesting they are generating high-quality chances that their finishing has yet to convert.

Cruz Azul's Overall of 62.4 is lifted primarily by their Set Pieces rating of 81.3, which stands 10.7 points above the Liga MX average of 70.6 and compensates for relatively modest Attack and Defense scores of just 53.3 each.

GKS Katowice's Overall of 62.4 is anchored by a league-leading Attack (80.0, ranked 1st of 18) and elite xG (74.3, ranked 2nd of 18), but dragged down sharply by a Defense rating of just 40.0 (11th of 18, well below the league average of 50.7), creating a pronounced imbalance that caps their overall ceiling despite their exceptional offensive output.

Radnicki 1923's Overall of 62.3 is significantly dragged down by their xG rating of just 25.3 (ranked #12 of 14, well below the league average of 53.8), which offsets an otherwise elite attacking profile — including the league's best Attack rating of 86.7 — suggesting their chances created don't align with their finishing output.

Vasteras SK FK's Overall of 62.3 is anchored by strong Defense (80.0, 4th in the league) and Discipline (75.0), but is significantly dragged down by an xG of just 32.7 — ranked 14th of 16 and well below the league average of 55.1 — revealing a team that defends well but struggles badly to generate quality chances.

Piast Gliwice's Overall of 62.3 is driven by elite Attack (60.0, #2) and Defense (80.0, #2) ratings that sit well above the league averages of 47.4 and 50.7 respectively, but is significantly dragged down by a Set Pieces score of just 43.8 — ranked #17 of 18 in a league where the average is 63.0, making it their most glaring weakness against an otherwise top-tier profile.

Hellas Verona's Overall of 62.2 is driven primarily by elite attacking production, ranking 1st in both Attack (66.7 vs. league average 44) and xG (77.0 vs. league average 42), which more than offset a below-average Defense (53.3, 13th) and weak Discipline (56.7, 15th).

Lech Poznan's standout trait is their Set Pieces rating of 84.4, which is 21.4 points above the league average of 63.0 and ranks 2nd in the Ekstraklasa, single-handedly elevating their Overall to 62.1 despite a below-average Defense of 46.7 that sits 8th in the league.

Heidenheim's Overall of 62.1 is buoyed by strong ratings in Attack (66.7, 5th), Form (66.7, 3rd), xG (74.7, 5th), and Discipline (66.7, 4th), but their Set Pieces score of 57.5 ranks 16th of 18 in a league where the average is 73.1, making it the single biggest drag pulling their Overall below what their other axes would otherwise suggest.

Hangzhou Greentown's Overall of 62 is defined almost entirely by the tension between their elite Attack rating of 93.3 (ranked 1st in the league, nearly 40 points above the league average of 52.9) and their anemic xG of 42.0 (ranked 11th), suggesting they are credited for attacking output that isn't yet translating into expected goals, while middling Form (46.7, 8th) and Defense (53.3, 6th) pull the average firmly toward the middle.

Shabab Al Ahli Dubai's standout trait is elite Discipline (91.7, ranked 1st in the league against a league average of 72.0), which pairs with a strong Defense (73.3, 3rd in league) to anchor their 62 Overall, even as their Attack (40.0, 8th of 13, well below the league average of 52.3) remains the clear weak point dragging the average down.

América Mineiro's Overall of 61.9 is driven almost entirely by their xG rating of 100.0—ranked 1st in Serie B and more than double the league average of 43.8—which offsets their below-average Attack (33.3, ranked 14th) and Form (40.0, ranked 13th) to pull the simple average well above what their other axes would otherwise suggest.

Al Ittihad's Overall of 61.9 is anchored by a Defense rating of 80.0 (3rd in the league, well above the 65.5 average), which compensates for a notably weak Attack of 40.0, creating a profile built on defensive solidity rather than offensive output.

Santos's overall of 61.9 is most meaningfully anchored by an exceptional Set Pieces rating of 95.8 — ranked 2nd in the league and nearly 30 points above the Serie A average of 67.7 — which compensates for a below-average Attack (53.3) and a weak Defense (46.7, below the league average of 51.3).

Maccabi Haifa's Overall of 61.8 is driven by elite Attack (80.0, 2nd in league vs. a 49.5 average) and Form (80.0, 2nd) pulling the average up, while a poor Discipline score (41.7, 10th) and middling Defense (53.3) act as a significant drag, creating a profile of a high-output team held back by off-ball vulnerabilities.

Ascoli's Overall of 61.7 is driven primarily by elite Set Pieces (81.3, ranked 1st in Serie B against a league average of 62.2) and a strong Defense (73.3, 2nd in the league), which offset a weak Attack (46.7) and poor Discipline (54.2, 17th), the team's clearest structural imbalance.

Hapoel Tel Aviv's 61.7 Overall is anchored by elite defensive and xG output — both ranked 1st in the league at 73.3 and 50.0 respectively, well clear of league averages of 48.6 and 48.4 — while their Discipline score of 46.7 (9th of 14, below the league average of 51.7) is the one axis dragging the overall figure down.

Cagliari's 61.6 Overall is propped up almost entirely by elite defensive solidity — a league-best 86.7 in Defense and a 2nd-place 83.3 in Discipline — which offset a severely weak attacking profile (Attack 33.3, ranked 13th; xG 30.0, ranked 16th) that drags the average down considerably.

Al Diriyah's Overall of 61.6 is driven primarily by an elite Defense (73.3, 2nd in the league vs. a 53.7 average) and a standout xG rating (77.7, 3rd in the league vs. a 52.2 average), which compensate for the team's weakest axis, Attack (40.0, below the league average of 44.1).

Mantova's 61.5 Overall is driven by elite rankings in Attack (66.7, #1 in Serie B) and Form (73.3, #2), which more than offset a notably weak Set Pieces score of 53.1 (#15), their only axis that falls below the league average of 62.2.

Hacken's most distinctive strength is their Attack rating of 60.0, which sits 10.4 points above the Allsvenskan average of 49.6 and ranks 6th in the league, making it their clearest above-average axis and the primary driver lifting their Overall to 61.5 despite middling scores in Form (53.3) and xG (51.3).

Al-Rayyan's Overall of 61.4 is anchored by a league-leading Form rating of 86.7 (ranked #1 of 12, versus a league average of 41.3) and strong Attack (73.3, #2) and Defense (66.7, #3), but is meaningfully dragged down by a Set Pieces score of just 25.0, which ranks #10 of 12 and sits 30.7 points below the league average of 55.7.

Shanghai Shenhua's Overall 61.4 reflects a profile defined by a dramatic internal imbalance: their Attack (80.0, 2nd in league) and Discipline (79.2, 3rd) are elite, but their Defense (20.0, 14th of 16) sits 25 points below the league average of 45.0 and drags the average down sharply despite strength across every other axis.

Huddersfield's 61.3 Overall is driven primarily by elite ratings in Set Pieces (80.0, 3rd in League One) and Discipline (83.3, also 3rd), both well above league averages of 66.8 and 67.8 respectively, compensating for a notably weak xG of 37.7 that ranks just 15th and sits well below the league average of 45.2.

Lens's Overall of 61.2 is propped up almost entirely by elite ratings in Set Pieces (100.0, ranked 1st in Ligue 1) and xG (97.0, ranked 3rd), which more than compensate for a poor Discipline score (56.7, ranked 17th) and weak Form (26.7, ranked 13th) that would otherwise drag the side much lower.

Lanus's 61.1 Overall is anchored by an elite Defense rating of 80.0 — ranked 1st in the Liga Profesional Argentina and nearly 20 points above the league average of 60.2 — which offsets a below-average Attack of 46.7 to produce a mid-tier but defensively distinguished overall profile.

Al-Arabi SC's Overall of 61.1 is anchored by a perfect 100.0 in Set Pieces (ranked #1 in the league, versus a league average of 55.7) and a league-leading Defense of 75.0, which together offset a below-average Attack of 41.7 and a below-average Discipline of 50.0.

Benfica's Overall of 61.1 is dragged down significantly by a Discipline rating of just 33.3 — dead last in the Primeira Liga at #18 of 18 and well below the league average of 59.9 — offsetting an otherwise dominant profile that includes the league's top Attack (86.7) and Form (80.0) scores.

Mainz's Overall of 61 is dragged down primarily by a glaring internal imbalance: despite ranking 5th in Attack (83.3) and 6th in Set Pieces (83.3), their xG of just 41.0 ranks 13th of 18 and sits well below the league average of 56.7, suggesting their attacking output and dead-ball threat are not translating into genuine goal-scoring chances.

Al-Ahli Jeddah's Overall of 61 is driven by elite attacking production — ranking 3rd in Attack (73.3 vs. league average 44.4) and 4th in xG (76.0 vs. league average 50.5) — but severely held back by a league-worst Defense of 46.7, which sits 12th of 18 and nearly 7 points below the league average of 53.3.

NK Varazdin's 60.9 Overall is driven by an unusually top-heavy profile: they rank #1 in the league in Defense (66.7), xG (64.3), Set Pieces (83.3), and Discipline (77.8), all well above HNL averages, which compensates for a last-tier Attack rating of just 33.3 that ranks #8 of 10.

Gillingham rank 1st in League Two for Attack (73.3), Defense (80.0), and Form (73.3), yet their Overall of 60.9 is dragged down significantly by an xG rating of just 21.3 — 22nd of 24 teams and well below the league average of 51.8 — suggesting their results and defensive solidity aren't being matched by the quality of chances they're creating or conceding per expected metrics.

Milford FC's 60.9 Overall is anchored by a well-rounded upper-tier profile, but their most distinctive edge is an xG rating of 62.0 (2nd in the league vs. a league average of 40.7), signaling that they generate high-quality chances far beyond their peers despite a modest Attack score of 40.0—suggesting their opportunities are better than their finishing currently reflects.

Al Wahda's 60.9 Overall is driven primarily by exceptional Form (80.0, 2nd in the league vs. a 47.7 average) and strong Defense (73.3, 3rd vs. a 45.1 average), which offset a notably weak Set Pieces rating of 37.5 (11th of 13, well below the 48.3 league average).

Atletico Madrid's profile is defined by a glaring split between their elite Discipline rating of 80.0 (ranked 1st in La Liga, well above the league average of 59.5) and their strikingly low xG of 31.0 (ranked 14th, far below the league average of 47.2), suggesting a team that excels at structured, controlled play but struggles to generate quality chances — a tension that anchors their Overall at 60.9 despite top-three finishes in Attack and Form.

Vancouver's profile is anchored by an elite Set Pieces rating of 83.3 (3rd in MLS, well above the league average of 65.4) and a standout xG of 73.0 (6th in MLS), but those strengths are partially offset by a Discipline score of just 55.6 (24th in MLS, below the league average of 63.2), pulling the Overall down to 60.9.

Charlotte's 60.8 Overall is anchored primarily by an elite Form rating of 73.3 (3rd in MLS, well above the league average of 43.6), which offsets a notably weak xG of 41.5 (18th, below the league average of 49.5), suggesting the team is winning more than its underlying chance creation would predict.

Alanyaspor's 60.8 Overall is anchored by exceptional discipline and defensive solidity — their Discipline rating of 83.3 ranks 2nd in the Süper Lig against a league average of 59.9, and their Defense of 66.7 ranks 5th — which offset a notably weak xG of 33.6 (13th, well below the league average of 44.4) that reflects genuine limitations in attack quality despite a respectable Attack rating of 46.7.

Future FC's 60.6 Overall is anchored by an elite Discipline rating of 79.2 — the highest in the league — which offsets their notably weak xG of 29.0 (ranked 14th of 20 and well below the league average of 38.4), reflecting a team that keeps matches controlled and concedes little through foul play but struggles to generate genuine scoring chances.

São Bernardo's 60.6 Overall is built almost entirely on defensive and disciplinary strength rather than attacking output — their Defense (73.3, 2nd in Serie B) and Discipline (76.7, 3rd) sit far above the league averages of 56.3 and 62.1 respectively, while their xG of 37.0 ranks just 10th and is the team's weakest axis, exposing a profile where preventing and controlling play matters far more than creating chances.

Cuiabá's Overall of 60.6 is anchored by elite non-attacking metrics — ranking 1st in Discipline (83.3), 2nd in Defense (73.3), and 2nd in Form (66.7) — but is significantly dragged down by a bottom-half xG rating of just 25.3 (14th of 20), which is the team's starkest weakness and the clearest reason their Overall doesn't climb higher despite their defensive and disciplinary dominance.

Club Africain's 59.7 Overall is anchored by elite Form (83.3, ranked #1 in the CAF Champions League against a league average of just 51.7) and a strong Defense (83.3), which offset their notably weak Attack (41.7, ranked #4 of 5 and below the league average of 47.8).

Godoy Cruz's elite Attack (60.0 vs. a league average of just 31.3, ranked 1st of 36) and exceptional Form (80.0, 2nd of 36) are the standout drivers lifting their Overall to 60.6, compensating for more modest Defense (73.3) and mid-table ratings in xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline.

Charleston Battery's Overall of 60.6 is driven primarily by elite Attack (73.3, ranked 3rd) and Defense (73.3, ranked 2nd) ratings that sit well above the league averages of 46.1 and 51.5 respectively, while their remaining axes — xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline — all sit at the league-median 50.0, meaning those two core competitive pillars are doing nearly all the heavy lifting.

Oxford United rank 3rd in Attack (73.3) and 3rd in Form (66.7), well above league averages of 50.6 and 45.6 respectively, but their xG of 41.3 (12th) and Set Pieces of 45.0 (21st of 24, against a league average of 66.8) drag the overall average down to 60.5, suggesting their attacking output isn't fully supported by underlying chance creation or dead-ball effectiveness.

Santa Clara's Overall of 60.5 is driven primarily by their elite Defense rating of 86.7 — ranked 1st in the Primeira Liga and 30 points above the league average of 56.7 — which compensates for below-average Set Pieces (50.0, #11) and Discipline (53.3, #14) scores.

Spartak Moscow's Overall of 60.4 is anchored by a league-leading Defense rating of 80.0 — nearly 25 points above the league average of 55.4 and their highest axis by far — but is meaningfully dragged down by an xG of just 33.3, which ranks 14th of 16 and sits well below both the league average of 52.2 and every other axis in their own profile.

Jeju United FC's 60.4 Overall is anchored by an elite defensive rating of 80.0 (ranked 1st in K League 1, well above the league average of 55.6) and league-leading Form (73.3) and xG (50.0) rankings, though their poor Discipline score of 62.5 (ranked 11th, versus the league average of 73.9) drags the average down and prevents an even higher Overall.

Kocaelispor's elite Defense (86.7, ranked 1st in the league vs. a 49.6 average) and strong Form (80.0, also 1st) lift their Overall to 60.4 despite severely dragging anchors in xG (31.5, 14th) and Set Pieces (37.5, 16th), making them a defensively dominant but attacking-deficient side whose ceiling is capped by an inability to generate quality chances.

Brest's Overall of 60.4 is propped up almost entirely by a perfect xG score of 100.0—ranking 1st in Ligue 1 and sitting 40.6 points above the league average of 59.4—which compensates for middling or below-average marks across Attack (46.7), Defense (46.7), Form (33.3), and Set Pieces (56.3).

Everton's profile is defined by a stark internal split: their Defense rating of 80.0 (2nd in the league, well above the 54.5 average) is the clear pillar holding up their 60.3 Overall, offsetting an Attack of just 40.0 that ranks 12th and sits 7.9 points below the league average.

Al-Jazira's Overall of 60.3 is anchored by a league-leading Defense rating of 86.7 (ranked 1st of 13, well above the league average of 45.1), but is significantly dragged down by a Set Pieces score of just 25.0 (ranked 12th of 13, versus a league average of 48.3), creating a wide internal imbalance that prevents a higher Overall despite their defensive dominance.

Ulsan's profile is defined by a sharp internal contradiction: they rank #1 in the league on xG (50.0) and #2 in Defense (73.3), yet their Discipline score of 60.0 ranks dead last (#12 of 12) against a league average of 73.9, and their Attack of 46.7 is the weakest of their own six axes, together pulling the Overall down to 60.3 despite their strong defensive and chance-creation foundation.

Petrojet's Overall of 60.2 is driven almost entirely by a league-leading xG rating of 88.3—more than double the league average of 38.4 and ranking 1st of 20 teams—which offsets a poor Defense rating of 46.7 that ranks 17th in the division.

APR's Overall of 60.2 is driven primarily by their elite Attack rating of 77.8 (ranked 1st of 8, well above the league average of 53.5), which compensates for a notably weak Defense of 66.7 that ranks just 6th of 8 in a competition where the league average defense is 78.1.

Brentford's 60.2 Overall is anchored by genuine strength in Attack (66.7, 3rd in the league) and Defense (73.3, 5th), but dragged down notably by a Set Pieces rating of just 46.9 — ranking 15th of 19 and sitting 13 points below the league average of 60 — making dead-ball situations the clearest drag on an otherwise above-average side.

Genk's xG rating of 100.0 is both a perfect score and the highest in the league by a significant margin (league average: 54.3), single-handedly anchoring their 60.1 Overall despite a league-worst Set Pieces rating of 34.4 (#17 of 18) and a weak Defense of 46.7 that sits below the league average of 52.2.

Frosinone's profile is defined by a striking internal contradiction: despite ranking 3rd–5th in the league across Attack, Defense, Form, and Set Pieces, their Discipline rating of 58.3 ranks 18th of 19 in a league where the average is 70.5, and their xG of 38.7 ranks 13th — two significant drags that pull their Overall down to 59.9 despite genuine competitive strength in most other dimensions.

Eibar leads the entire league in Attack (73.3), Defense (93.3), and Form (100.0), yet their Overall of 59.9 is dragged down sharply by a dead-last ranking in Set Pieces (27.5, #22 of 22) and near-bottom finishes in Discipline (33.3, #20) and xG (31.7, #14), exposing a team that dominates conventional metrics but is severely undermined by its weakness in dead-ball situations and shot quality.

Portsmouth's Overall of 59.8 is propped up almost entirely by elite discipline (86.7, 2nd in the league) and a perfect set-piece rating (100.0, 1st in the league), which compensate for genuinely poor attack (33.3, 16th) and form (33.3, 16th) that both sit well below the Championship averages of 47.2 and 45.0 respectively.

Tianjin Teda's Overall of 59.8 is anchored by a league-leading Set Pieces rating of 87.5 (ranked 1st of 16, well above the league average of 64.3), which compensates for a weak Attack (40.0, ranked 10th) and poor xG (38.7, ranked 12th) that would otherwise drag the score significantly lower.

Odense's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating — the highest in the Superliga and nearly double the league average of 55.1 — single-handedly rescues their Overall score of 59.8, offsetting an otherwise weak profile headlined by bottom-tier Attack (40.0, #10) and Defense (40.0, #9) marks.

Grasshoppers' Overall of 59.7 is propped up almost entirely by a league-leading xG rating of 99.7 — nearly 41 points above the league average of 58.9 — which compensates for a strikingly weak Defense score of just 20.0, ranked 10th of 12 and less than half the league average of 36.7.

NEOM's xG rating of 35.7 is a stark outlier — ranking 13th of 18 in the league and sitting far below their own other axes (which range from 60.0 to 70.0) — suggesting that despite strong Attack, Defense, and Form rankings (all 4th), their underlying shot quality is poor, dragging the Overall down to 59.6.

Palmeiras's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating (ranked 1st in Serie A, well above the league average of 67.8) is their most dominant axis and lifts their Overall to 59.6 despite a glaring weakness in Attack (33.3, ranked 15th) and poor Discipline (40.0, ranked 19th).

Al-Nassr's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating — the highest in the Pro League and 39 points above the league average of 60.9 — is the single standout axis that lifts their Overall to 59.5, offsetting a notably weak Defense score of 40.0 that ranks just 15th of 18 teams.

Villarreal's 59.4 Overall is propped up by elite showings in Set Pieces (90.0, 2nd in La Liga) and Attack (73.3, also 2nd), but dragged down sharply by a Defense rating of just 33.3 that ranks 14th in the league — nearly 13 points below the La Liga average of 46.3 — making defensive vulnerability the single biggest suppressor of what would otherwise be a much higher score.

Hartford Athletic's Overall of 59.4 is driven primarily by elite defensive and form ratings (both 73.3, ranked #2 in the league) that sit well above their own Attack (60.0), xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline scores (all 50.0), with those defensive and form strengths also towering over the league averages of 51.5 and 41.9 respectively, pulling the overall average upward despite the team being league-average across three of six axes.

Chaco For Ever's perfect 100.0 Defense rating — the best in the entire 36-team Primera Nacional and well above the league average of 69.8 — is the primary engine behind their 59.4 Overall, compensating for a below-average Attack of 33.3 that is their only axis dragging the score down.

FC Kharkiv's Overall rating of 59.4 is anchored by elite positional rankings — finishing #1 in Attack (73.3 vs. league average 36.3), xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline — but is pulled down by a relatively weak Form score of 60.0, suggesting strong underlying metrics that haven't yet fully translated into consistent recent results.

Halmstad's Overall of 59.4 is propped up by standout discipline (83.3, 3rd in Allsvenskan) and set pieces (75.0, 4th), which offset a weak attack (40.0, 10th) and particularly poor xG (38.3, 13th) — nearly 17 points below the league average of 55.1 — revealing a team that keeps clean sheets and wins dead-ball situations but struggles to generate genuine scoring threat.

AEK Athens FC ranks 2nd in the league across Attack (66.7), Defense (80.0), Form (73.3), and Discipline (70.0), yet their Overall of 59.4 is dragged down sharply by an xG rating of just 14.0 — dead last in Super League 1 and far below the league average of 39.5 — revealing a team that dominates most dimensions but severely underperforms in expected goals output.

Al-Wasl's Overall of 59.2 is lifted primarily by a standout Attack rating of 73.3 (3rd in the league, well above the 52.3 average) and a strong Discipline score of 77.8, which together offset a weak Form rating of 46.7 that sits below the league average of 47.7 and drags the composite down.

Krylia Sovetov's exceptional attacking output — ranking 1st in Attack (73.3 vs. league average 45.8) and 2nd in xG (90.7 vs. league average 52.2) — drives their above-average Overall of 59.1, but their dead-last Set Pieces rating of 18.8 (league average 53.1) significantly drags that figure down despite their strong offensive profile.

Modena's profile is defined by a glaring internal contradiction: despite ranking 2nd in Serie B for Defense (73.3) and 4th for Form (66.7), their xG sits at just 22.7—14th lowest in the league and nearly 20 points below the Serie B average of 42—dragging the Overall down to 58.9 and revealing a team that defends and competes well but creates genuine scoring chances at one of the league's worst rates.

Al Shabab's Overall of 58.9 is carried almost entirely by a perfect 100.0 in Set Pieces (1st of 18, well above the league average of 60.9) and strong Discipline of 83.3 (2nd of 18), which offset a damaging Form rating of just 26.7 (13th of 18) and below-average Defense of 46.7 (12th of 18).

Bielefeld's Overall of 58.9 is propped up by a standout xG rating of 79.3 (2nd in the league, well above the 55.9 average), reflecting strong underlying attacking threat, but this is severely dragged down by a Defense of just 33.3 and a Form of 33.3, both well below the league averages of 45.2 and 45.6 respectively, suggesting a team that creates chances but concedes too freely and has struggled to convert that potential into results.

FC Nordsjaelland's Overall of 58.8 is propped up almost entirely by a league-best xG rating of 100.0—40 points above the league average of 59.9—yet that finishing threat is severely undermined by a Set Pieces score of just 31.3, the worst in the Superliga and 23.8 points below the league average, leaving the club with a lopsided profile where elite expected output coexists with a glaring dead-ball weakness.

Vaduz's 58.8 Overall is pulled up primarily by a standout xG rating of 77.0 (3rd in the league, well above the 58.9 average) and a league-best Discipline score of 70.0, which compensate for a weak Defense (40.0) and poor Form (40.0) that drag the average down.

Tijuana's Overall of 58.7 is propped up by a league-best xG rating of 71.8—more than 26 points above the Liga MX average of 45.6—which offsets a weak Defense score of 40.0 (14th of 17, well below the league average of 54.1) to keep the club in mid-table territory overall.

CSKA Moscow's 58.7 Overall is driven primarily by elite attacking output (73.3, ranked 1st in the league vs. a 45.8 average) and strong recent form (73.3, 2nd in the league vs. a 45.4 average), which offset a below-average Discipline rating of 45.8 and a middling Defense score of 53.3 that sits 7th in the league.

Fürth's Overall of 58.6 is propped up by a striking mismatch between their elite statistical production (xG 79.0, ranked 3rd in the league vs. a league average of 55.9) and league-best Discipline (77.8, ranked 1st vs. a league average of 55.5), which compensate for a notably weak Defense (33.3, ranked 12th, well below the league average of 45.2) and poor Form (33.3, ranked 11th).

Galatasaray's Overall of 58.6 is lifted primarily by a league-leading Set Pieces score of 90.0 — 35 points above the Süper Lig average of 55.2 and their single highest axis — which offsets a below-average Defense rating of 26.7 that ranks just 13th of 18 teams.

Hibernian's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating — the highest in the Premiership and well above the league average of 75.1 — is the standout feature of their profile, and it helps lift their Overall to 58.5 despite poor Attack (33.3, #8) and Form (26.7, #10) scores that would otherwise drag them much lower.

Leeds's Overall of 58.4 is anchored by a league-leading Defense score of 80.0 (ranked 1st of 20, well above the 54.8 league average), but significantly dragged down by an xG of just 32.2 (ranked 16th of 20, versus a league average of 50.8), revealing a team that excels at preventing goals while struggling to generate genuine attacking threat.

Lillestrom's Overall of 58.4 is propped up almost entirely by elite Set Pieces (82.5, 3rd in the league) and strong xG (78.0, 6th), which offset a dangerously weak Attack (40.0, 14th) and poor Form (40.0, 13th) that would otherwise drag them far lower.

Austria Lustenau's Overall of 58.4 is propped up by standout Set Pieces (75.0, 3rd in the league vs. a 63.2 average) and Discipline (72.2, 2nd vs. a 60.6 average), which compensate for a notably weak Attack rating of 40.0 that sits below both their own other axes and the league average of 47.2.

Pachuca's 58.3 Overall is anchored by genuine defensive and attacking strength (73.3 and 60.0, ranked 2nd and 4th in Liga MX respectively), but is dragged down significantly by a Discipline rating of just 40.0, the worst in the league at 16th of 17 and 21.8 points below the league average, creating a lopsided profile where elite defensive solidity coexists with the division's most undisciplined conduct.

Al Merreikh's profile is defined by a sharp internal imbalance: their Defense rating of 100.0 (ranked #1 in the CAF Champions League, well above the 71.1 league average) anchors their 58.3 Overall, while their Attack of just 22.2 (ranked #9, versus a 46.1 league average) prevents a significantly higher score despite their elite defensive standing.

Athletic Club's Overall of 58.3 is propped up by a striking xG rating of 92.7 (2nd in the league, more than double the league average of 43.8), which compensates for a severely underperforming Attack axis of just 26.7 (16th of 20), suggesting the team creates high-quality chances but lacks the finishing to convert them into actual goals or results.

Amed's Overall of 58.2 is anchored by elite attacking and creative output — ranked 2nd in Attack (80.0) and 3rd in both xG (70.1) and Form (66.7) against league averages of 48.5, 45.8, and 45.6 respectively — but their Discipline rating of just 26.7 (17th of 18, versus a league average of 58.0) acts as a significant drag, preventing those strengths from translating into a higher Overall score.

Milan's most notable weakness relative to their own profile is Set Pieces, where their 50.0 rating ranks just 13th in Serie A and sits below the league average of 56.0, dragging on an otherwise consistently mid-to-upper-table performance across Attack (53.3), Defense (66.7), and Discipline (73.3) to produce an Overall of 58.

Lyngby's Overall 58 is anchored by a glaring internal imbalance: their Attack rating of 40.0 ranks 10th in the Superliga and sits 23.3 points below the league average of 63.3, while their Defense (60.0, 3rd), xG (65.7, 4th), and Discipline (66.7, 6th) all sit at or above league norms, meaning a chronically weak attack drags down an otherwise solid defensive and process-oriented profile.

Instituto Cordoba's Overall of 57.9 is propped up by genuine strengths in Set Pieces (75.0, ranked 4th) and Form (66.7, ranked 2nd), but those gains are significantly undercut by a Discipline rating of just 41.7 — dead last in the league at 29th of 29, nearly 19 points below the league average of 60.4.

Wisła Płock's Overall of 57.9 is propped up almost entirely by a striking disconnect between their output metrics and their results: despite ranking just #13 in Attack (40.0) and #11 in Defense (40.0), they rank #4 in xG (66.3) — 16.7 points above the league average of 49.6 — suggesting they are generating far better scoring and preventing chances than their actual attacking and defensive returns reflect, with Set Pieces (77.5, #6) and Discipline (76.7, #5) providing additional structural strengths that keep their average afloat.

Sabadell's Overall of 57.9 is driven primarily by standout Form (66.7, ranked 3rd in the league against a league average of 47.0) and xG (62.0, ranked 4th against a league average of 41.5), which elevate the team well above mid-table despite a below-average Discipline score (50.0, ranked 15th) that prevents an even higher Overall.

Energie Cottbus's perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating (ranked 1st in the league, well above the 73.1 average) lifts their Overall to 57.7 despite a glaring Defense score of just 20.0 (ranked 17th of 18, versus the league average of 45.2), making theirs a profile defined by extreme imbalance between their greatest strength and most critical weakness.

Heerenveen's Overall of 57.7 is propped up by two standout off-ball axes — Discipline (83.3, 2nd in the league vs. a 72.2 average) and Set Pieces (78.1, 6th vs. a 63.4 average) — which compensate for a notably weak Form rating of 33.3 that sits well below the league average of 42.6.

Sao Paulo's 57.7 Overall is propped up by elite defensive solidity (73.3, ranked 3rd) and discipline (70.0, ranked 2nd) compensating for a strikingly poor attack rating of just 26.7 — nearly 20 points below the league average of 47 and ranked 18th of 20 — creating a lopsided profile where defensive strength masks a severe lack of attacking output.

Rosario Central's Overall of 57.7 is anchored almost entirely by their extraordinary Set Pieces rating of 97.5 — ranked 1st of 29 teams and 42.5 points above the league average of 55 — which compensates for below-average Attack (40.0) and poor Discipline (43.3, ranked 25th).

Al-Duhail's 57.7 Overall is anchored by elite defensive and set-piece strengths — ranking 1st in the league in Defense (75.0 vs. a 41.9 league average) and 3rd in Set Pieces (79.2 vs. 55.7) — which more than compensate for a notably weak Attack rating of 41.7, the team's lowest axis and well below the league average of 52.5.

Benevento's xG rating of 74.3 stands out as their single strongest asset — ranking 2nd in Serie B and sitting 32 points above the league average of 42 — yet their Attack rating of just 40.0 (12th in the league) suggests they are consistently generating high-quality chances without converting them, a disconnect that caps their Overall at 57.6 despite elite underlying threat creation.

Aarhus's 57.6 Overall is pulled down primarily by a glaring weakness in Form (33.3, ranked #11 of 12) and Defense (40.0, ranked #9 of 12), which drag against otherwise competitive ratings in Set Pieces (68.8, #3), Discipline (70.8, #4), and xG (65.7, #4).

Baltika's 57.5 Overall is anchored by exceptional non-attacking specialisms: their Set Pieces rating of 78.1 (2nd in the league, well above the 53.1 average) and league-leading Discipline score of 66.7 (1st of 16, versus a 45.0 average) compensate for a poor Form rating of 33.3 (11th), lifting the overall average meaningfully above what their mid-table Attack (53.3) and Defense (53.3) alone would suggest.

Reims's 57.5 Overall is held back almost entirely by a league-worst Set Pieces score of 27.5 — nearly 27 points below the Ligue 2 average of 54.6 — which drags down the simple average despite the club ranking 1st in both Form (73.3) and xG (50.0) and 2nd in Attack (80.0).

Barnsley's Overall of 57.5 is propped up almost entirely by a perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating (ranked 1st in League One, well above the 66.8 league average), which offsets a glaring defensive weakness of just 26.7 (ranked 21st) that would otherwise drag their score considerably lower.

GO Ahead Eagles' Overall of 57.4 is propped up by a Set Pieces rating of 78.1 (5th in the Eredivisie, well above the league average of 60.9), which offsets a notably weak Defense score of just 26.7 — the team's lowest axis and below the league average of 32.6.

Motherwell's Overall of 57.4 is propped up by elite Discipline (80.0, ranked 1st in the league) and strong Set Pieces (87.5) compensating for a glaring defensive weakness — their Defense rating of 33.3 is dead last in the Premiership and sits 25 points below the league average of 58.3.

Real Sociedad's Overall of 57.4 is propped up almost entirely by a perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating — the highest in La Liga and 40.1 points above the league average of 59.9 — which compensates for below-average Attack (46.7, ranked 11th) and Defense (40.0, ranked 11th) scores that would otherwise drag the club well below mid-table.

Estrela's profile is defined by a striking contradiction: their xG of 70.0 ranks 2nd in the Primeira Liga and sits nearly double the league average of 35.5, signaling genuine attacking threat, yet their Defense of 33.3 ranks 15th of 18 and falls well below the league average of 56.7, leaving them exposed at the back in a way that caps their Overall at 57.4.

Orlando City's Overall of 57.4 is pulled upward by an elite Attack rating of 80.0 (4th in MLS, well above the league average of 53.3), but significantly dragged down by a Defense of just 40.0 (20th) and a Set Pieces rating of 47.5 (29th of 30, versus the league average of 65.4), creating a lopsided profile where offensive firepower cannot compensate for glaring weaknesses elsewhere.

York's 57.3 Overall is driven upward by genuine strength in Set Pieces (75.0, 5th in the league vs. a 59.0 average) and Discipline (76.7, also 5th vs. a 65.5 average), but held back significantly by an xG rating of just 32.3 — ranking 18th of 24 and sitting well below the league average of 51.8 — suggesting the team creates far less high-quality open-play chance volume than their other strengths might imply.

Cheltenham's Overall of 57.3 is driven primarily by a league-leading Attack rating of 73.3 (ranked 1st of 24, well above the league average of 42.8), which compensates for a poor Defense rating of 46.7 (ranked 20th of 24, well below the league average of 57.2), creating a high-variance profile that averages out to a mid-table score.

Rotherham's xG rating of 71.3 stands well above their other five axes (all between 52.5 and 60.0) and is 19.5 points clear of the League Two average of 51.8, ranking 6th in the division, making it the clear outlier that lifts their Overall score to 57.3 despite middling-to-below-average rankings in Set Pieces (14th) and Discipline (15th).

Defensores De Belgrano's 57.2 Overall is driven primarily by an elite Defense rating of 80.0 — well above the league average of 68.7 and ranking 6th of 36 — combined with strong Form (66.7, ranked 4th) that offset a relatively modest Attack of 46.7, which, despite ranking 6th in the league, remains the team's weakest axis and the main drag on a higher Overall score.

Montpellier's profile is defined by a striking imbalance: their Attack rating of 26.7 ranks 14th in Ligue 2 and sits nearly 20 points below the league average of 45.9, yet their Defense (73.3, 3rd), Set Pieces (70.0, 4th), and Discipline (70.0, 3rd) all rank among the league's best, producing an Overall of 57.2 that reflects a team built entirely on defensive solidity rather than attacking output.

Red Star FC 93's Overall of 57.2 is pulled up primarily by an elite Set Pieces rating of 78.1 (3rd in Ligue 2, well above the league average of 54.6) and a league-leading Form score of 66.7 (2nd, vs. a league average of 43.7), which offset a Discipline rating of just 41.7 that ranks 16th of 18 teams against a league average of 61.0.

Leicester's 57.1 Overall is propped up almost entirely by their Set Pieces rating of 78.1 — a full 11.3 points above the league average of 66.8 and their highest axis by a significant margin — compensating for below-average Attack (46.7, ranked 12th) and a notably weak Defense (46.7, ranked 16th).

Leganés's Overall of 57 is held up by an unusually strong defensive and disciplinary profile — ranking 4th in the league in both Defense (73.3 vs. the 58.5 average) and Discipline (70.8 vs. 55.1) — which compensates for a severely below-average Attack of 33.3 (14th, against a league average of 41.5) and Set Pieces of 43.8 (18th).

Atletico-MG's Overall of 57 is driven primarily by their standout Discipline rating of 86.7 — the highest in Serie A and nearly 29 points above the league average of 57.7 — which compensates for weaknesses like Defense (46.7, below the league's 51.3) and a mid-table xG rank of #11.

Atlético Goianiense's Overall of 57 is held back almost entirely by their xG rating of 20.3, which ranks 17th of 20 in Serie B and sits far below the league average of 43.8, even as the club excels across Attack (60.0, 3rd), Defense (73.3, 2nd), and Form (66.7, 2nd).

Korona Kielce's Overall 57 is anchored by genuine strengths in Form (66.7, 3rd in the league) and Discipline (75.0), but dragged down sharply by an xG rating of just 30.7 — ranked 16th of 18 and nearly 19 points below the league average of 49.6 — revealing a team that competes hard and stays organized yet badly underperforms in actual chance creation.

Lijabatho's Overall of 57 is anchored by a strong Attack rating of 75.0—the highest in the CAF Champions League group against a league average of just 47.8—but is pulled down significantly by a Form score of only 41.7, reflecting poor recent results that undercut what is otherwise a well-rounded attacking profile.

FC Seoul's Overall of 57 is propped up by elite Discipline (95.8, ranked #1 in the league vs. a 73.9 average) and solid Defense (66.7, #4) compensating for a critically weak Attack (26.7, #11 of 12, well below the league's 43.3 average), creating a profile where defensive solidity and off-ball conduct mask a significant lack of attacking output.

Defensa Y Justicia's profile is defined by a striking split between their elite defensive solidity (73.3, ranked 3rd in the league vs. a 60.2 average) and excellent current form (66.7, ranked 2nd) on one side, and a notably weak Set Pieces rating (40.0, ranked 22nd, well below the 54.5 league average) on the other, with those extremes balancing out to a modest 56.9 Overall.

Durban City's 56.9 Overall is shaped by a stark internal imbalance: their Defense (73.3, 4th in the league) and Discipline (77.8) are well above league averages of 61.2 and 71.4 respectively, while their Attack (26.7) is the team's weakest axis by far and sits below even the league average of 37.1, suggesting a side built to suppress rather than score.

Krasnodar's 56.9 Overall is propped up by elite defensive and disciplinary ratings (80.0 and 60.0, ranked 2nd in the league on both axes well above league averages of 55.8 and 45.0), which offset a strikingly weak Attack score of 33.3 that ranks 12th of 16 and sits nearly 12.5 points below the league average of 45.8.

Sharjah FC's 56.9 Overall is lifted primarily by a strong Attack rating of 66.7 — well above the league average of 52.3 — while their Discipline score of 61.1 ranks just 10th in the league against a league average of 72.0, meaning their disciplinary issues are the clearest drag preventing a higher overall mark.

Westerlo's elite Attack (80.0, #2) and Discipline (83.3, #2) are severely undercut by a league-worst xG rating of 21.7 (#18 of 18, well below the league average of 53.9) and a weak Set Pieces score of 42.5 (#16), suggesting the team creates chances and avoids indiscipline but badly underperforms expected goals, dragging their Overall down to 56.8 despite their standout strengths.

Chengdu Better City's Overall of 56.8 is propped up by a standout xG rating of 85.7 (3rd in the league, well above the league average of 52.4), which offsets notably weak scores in Defense (40.0, 11th), Set Pieces (55.0, 11th), and Discipline (53.3, 11th) that drag the average down.

Deportivo La Coruna's highest individual axis is Set Pieces at 70.0, ranking 6th in La Liga and sitting well above their own team average of 56.8, which helps lift their Overall to 56.8 despite a relatively weak attack (53.3) and xG (47.3) that rank only 8th in the league.

OFI's Set Pieces rating of 32.5 is strikingly the team's weakest axis by far — ranking 13th of 14 in the league and sitting well below the league average of 52.1 — dragging down an Overall of 56.8 that would otherwise reflect a side genuinely strong across Defense (73.3), Discipline (70.0), and Form (66.7).

Shandong Luneng's Overall of 56.8 is lifted primarily by their Form rating of 66.7 (2nd in the league, well above the 42.1 league average), but dragged down by a Discipline score of just 46.7 that ranks 15th of 16 — nearly 19 points below the league norm of 65.4 — making disciplinary issues the single biggest drag on an otherwise above-average profile.

QPR's Overall of 56.7 is propped up almost entirely by a perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating — the best in the Championship and 33.6 points above the league average — which compensates for a weak Attack of 33.3 (16th) and poor Discipline of 55.6 (20th) that would otherwise drag the score considerably lower.

Blackpool's Overall of 56.7 is propped up almost entirely by a league-elite xG rating of 91.0 (3rd of 24, versus a league average of 45.2), which offsets a glaring defensive weakness of just 26.7 (21st of 24) and poor Form of 26.7 (19th of 24) that drag the average down sharply.

Vålerenga's Overall of 56.7 is dragged down almost entirely by a catastrophic Defense rating of just 6.7 (ranked 14th of 16, against a league average of 40.0) and a Form rating of 20.0 (ranked 15th of 16), which cancel out otherwise elite scores in xG (87.8, 4th) and Set Pieces (82.5, 3rd).

Sunderland's Overall of 56.6 is propped up significantly by an xG rating of 82.0—third in the Premier League and well above the league average of 50.8—which offsets otherwise below-average Attack (40.0, 12th) and Defense (46.7, 12th) scores that reflect their on-pitch struggles translating underlying quality into results.

FC Zurich's most distinctive trait is their Discipline rating of 66.7 (2nd in the league, well above the 56.4 league average), which lifts their Overall to 56.6 despite a Defense score of just 33.3 that ranks only 6th and drags the profile down.

Kashima's perfect 100.0 Attack rating (ranked #1 in J1) and league-leading xG of 61.7 are severely undermined by a 33.3 Defense score (ranked #10 of 11, well below the league average of 57.3), pulling their Overall down to a middling 56.6 despite their elite offensive output.

San Jose's 56.5 Overall is anchored by genuinely elite defensive and set-piece outputs — ranking 6th (66.7) and 5th (75.0) in MLS respectively, both well above league averages of 46.2 and 65.4 — while their attack (46.7, ranked 15th) and xG (40.7, ranked 19th) drag the average down, revealing a team that creates structure and dead-ball danger but struggles to generate open-play threat.

Südtirol's Overall of 56.5 is anchored by elite defensive and disciplinary performance (Defense 80.0, ranked 1st; Discipline 77.8, ranked 3rd) but is significantly dragged down by the two lowest-ranked axes in the league — xG at 18.7 (18th) and Set Pieces at 29.2 (19th) — creating a profile where defensive solidity cannot fully compensate for the team's near-bottom-of-league output quality and dead-ball threat.

Gangwon FC's Overall of 56.5 is anchored by a standout defensive rating of 73.3 (2nd in the league, well above the league average of 55.6) and strong Discipline at 79.2, which offset a weak Attack of 40.0 and poor Form of 40.0 that drag the average down.

LAFC's profile is defined almost entirely by a perfect 100.0 Set Pieces rating—the best in MLS and nearly 35 points above the league average of 65.4—which single-handedly anchors their 56.4 Overall despite a notably weak xG of 36.0 (ranked 21st) that drags the average down.

Rijeka's 56.1 Overall is anchored by a standout Set Pieces rating of 72.5 (2nd in the HNL, well above the league average of 54.5), which helps offset a notably weak xG score of 31.0 that ranks 8th in the league and sits far below their own other axes.

Norwich's profile is defined by a stark internal contradiction: their Attack (73.3, 2nd in the league) and xG (76.7, 5th) rank among the Championship's elite, yet their Defense sits at just 26.7 — 23rd of 24 teams and nearly 26 points below the league average of 52.5 — and that defensive collapse drags their Overall down to a middling 56.1 despite genuine offensive quality.

Dynamo Kyiv's 56.1 Overall is anchored by a strong defensive rating of 73.3 (3rd in the league, well above the 62.9 average) and elite Form of 66.7 (2nd in the league against a 42.9 average), which compensate for a relatively modest Attack of 46.7 that, despite ranking 5th, limits how high the overall score can climb.

San Martin S.J.'s Overall of 56.1 is anchored by an exceptional Defense rating of 80.0 (ranked 6th in the league, well above the 68.7 average), which offsets a notably weak Attack of 40.0 and lifts the team's average despite middling scores elsewhere.

Silkeborg's Overall of 56.1 is propped up almost entirely by their league-leading Discipline rating of 94.4 — nearly 27 points above the Superliga average of 66.9 — which offsets bottom-half finishes in Attack (53.3, ranked 8th), Form (40.0, ranked 10th), and xG (45.7, ranked 9th).

Deportivo Madryn's 56.1 Overall is driven primarily by their Attack rating of 53.3 — ranked 4th in the league against a Primera Nacional average of just 31.3 — which stands well above their own other axes and contributes the most meaningful lift above the league norm, while their equally strong Form (60.0, ranked 7th) adds further separation from the typical side in this division.

Excelsior's most distinctive trait is their Defense rating of 53.3 (ranked 4th of 18), which towers over the Eredivisie average of 31.9 and stands as their strongest positional rank, helping lift their Overall to 56.1 despite a below-average xG of 44.0 (12th) dragging in the opposite direction.

Cambridge United's most distinctive feature is their Set Pieces rating of 72.5, which is their highest axis by a clear margin and sits above the league average of 66.8, yet this strength is offset by a notably weak xG of 40.7 — well below the league average of 45.2 and their lowest axis — suggesting they generate attacking threat more from dead-ball situations than open play, producing a modest Overall of 56.1.

Maccabi Petah Tikva's Overall of 55.9 is propped up by elite ratings in Discipline (87.5, ranked 1st) and Set Pieces (78.1, ranked 2nd) — both well above the league averages of 51.7 and 56.0 respectively — which offset a severely weak Defense score of 26.7, ranked 12th of 14 and nearly half the league average of 48.6.

PAOK's Overall of 55.9 is driven primarily by an Attack rating of 66.7 (ranked 2nd in the league, well above the league average of 40), which more than compensates for a below-average Defense score of 46.7 that ranks just 9th of 14 clubs.

Bristol City's Overall of 55.9 is propped up by elite non-attacking metrics — ranking 4th in Discipline (80.0 vs. league average 67.9) and 5th in Form (60.0 vs. league average 45.0) — but is severely dragged down by a league-worst xG of 20.3, nearly 32 points below the Championship average of 52.3, exposing a team that stays organised and in form yet generates almost no quality attacking threat.

CRB's 54.2 Overall is driven primarily by relative strengths in Attack (53.3, ranked 6th) and Form (60.0, ranked 5th), which offset a notably weak Defense rating of 46.7 — the team's lowest axis and a #16 ranking that sits well below the league average of 56.7.

AFC Wimbledon's Overall of 55 is built almost entirely on defensive and form excellence — ranking 1st in the league in both Defense (73.3 vs. a 48.6 average) and Form (66.7 vs. a 44.5 average) — while their attack (33.3, ranked 19th) and xG (17.7, ranked 23rd) are among the worst in League One, creating a profile where elite defensive solidity compensates for a near-historic lack of attacking output.

Al Kholood's Overall of 55.8 is propped up by a standout Set Pieces rating of 78.1 (5th in the league, well above the 60.9 average), which compensates for a notably weak xG of 38.3 (12th, well below the 50.5 league average) and poor Discipline of 58.3 (16th, versus the 66.0 league average).

Troyes's Overall of 55.7 is propped up almost entirely by a perfect 100.0 in Set Pieces (ranked #1 in Ligue 1) and an 83.3 in Discipline (also #1), which together offset an Attack of just 26.7 and a Defense of 26.7 — both near the bottom of the league at #16 and #17 respectively.

Portland's Overall of 61.1 is propped up by elite Discipline (88.9, ranked 1st in MLS) and Set Pieces (83.3, ranked 3rd), which more than offset a severely weak Defense score of 26.7 (ranked 25th) that sits nearly 19 points below the league average of 45.8.

Argentinos JRS's Overall of 55.7 is propped up by elite defensive solidity (73.3, #3 in the league) and a league-leading set-piece threat (87.5, #3, well above the 54.7 league average), which offset a severely below-average attack (26.7, #21) that ranks among the worst in Liga Profesional Argentina.

Cardiff's profile is defined by a stark internal contradiction: they rank #1 in the Championship for Set Pieces (100.0) and #5 for xG (74.7), yet rank #23 for Form (13.3) and #19 for Attack (26.7), suggesting they create opportunities but fail to convert them consistently, which drags their Overall down to 53.8 despite elite ratings in two key axes.

Vélez Sarsfield's profile is defined by a striking contrast between their elite Discipline rating of 79.2 (2nd in the league, well above the 60.0 average) and their exceptionally low xG of 24.8 (22nd, far below the league average of 39.3), meaning disciplined off-ball behavior props up their 55.6 Overall while a lack of genuine attacking threat prevents it from climbing higher.

Gimnasia L.P.'s Overall of 55.6 is driven by genuine attacking threat — ranking 3rd in Attack (60.0) and 4th in xG (65.3) against a league average of just 40.5 and 39.5 respectively — though their Defense rating of 46.7 (22nd of 29, well below the league average of 60.0) prevents a higher score.

Sassuolo's 55.6 Overall is driven upward by genuine attacking quality — ranking 4th in Serie A on Attack (60.0 vs. the league average of 45.3) and 5th on xG (58.4 vs. 45.2) — but held back significantly by a Defense rating of just 40.0, which ranks 14th of 19 and sits well below the league average of 51.2.

Partizan's 54.6 Overall is propped up by elite attacking production—ranking 2nd in Attack (60.0 vs. a league average of 39.1) and 3rd in xG (74.0 vs. 52.5)—but dragged down significantly by a glaring defensive weakness, sitting 13th of 14 in Defense at just 33.3 against a league average of 57.6.

Union Santa Fe's Overall of 55.2 is driven almost entirely by their league-leading Attack rating of 80.0 (ranked 1st of 29, well above the league average of 39.5), but this is heavily offset by a Defense rating of just 46.7 (ranked 22nd), which sits 14.5 points below the league average of 61.2, creating a sharply imbalanced profile that caps their overall score.

Celta Vigo's Overall of 55.1 is anchored by an elite Defense rating of 80.0 — ranked 1st in La Liga and 35 points above the league average of 44.9 — which offsets their weak Attack (46.7), xG (39.0), and Form (40.0) to lift the team's simple average well above what their offensive numbers alone would suggest.

Bradford's 59.5 Overall is shaped by a stark internal split: their Attack (26.7, ranked #22) and xG (25.3, ranked #21) are among the league's worst, yet their Defense (73.3, ranked #1 in League One) and Set Pieces (96.9, ranked #3) are exceptional, with the defensive solidity in particular pulling the overall average well above what their attacking output alone would suggest.

Deportivo Morón's 57.2 Overall is driven primarily by an elite Form rating of 73.3 (3rd in the league against a league average of 44.9) and a standout Attack rating of 53.3 (4th in the league against a league average of just 30.4), which offset a merely average Defense of 66.7 (18th) to push them well above the typical Primera Nacional side.

Central Coast's Overall of 55 is driven primarily by a well-rounded profile with no major weaknesses, most notably a Defense rating of 60 that ranks 3rd in a league where the average is just 40.8, combining with above-average Form (60 vs. league average 44.8) to lift their score above a middling Attack (60, but only 5th-ranked) and flat mid-table marks in xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline.

Karpaty's 60.6 Overall is anchored by a dominant defensive rating of 80.0—the highest in the league against a league average of 60.8—complemented by a top-two finish in Attack (66.7) and Form (66.7), while mid-table scores of 50.0 in xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline prevent those strengths from lifting the average further.

Notts County's 53.8 Overall is anchored by a strong defensive rating of 60.0 (6th in League One, well above the 48.6 league average), which offsets a notably weak Attack of 40.0 (15th, versus the 51.7 league average) to keep the club in mid-table territory.

Braga's Overall of 54.9 is anchored by an elite Defense rating of 80.0 (2nd in the league, well above the 55.2 average), which offsets a notably weak Attack (33.3, below the 42.6 league average) and low xG (27.7 vs. 32.8 average), painting a portrait of a defensively dominant side that struggles to generate and convert offensive chances.

Maccabi Netanya's Overall of 56.5 is propped up by a remarkably strong defensive and set-piece profile — ranking 1st in the league in both Defense (66.7 vs. a 48.6 average) and Set Pieces (83.3 vs. a 56.7 average) — which compensates for well-below-average Attack (41.7, 8th of 14) and Form (41.7, 9th of 14) that would otherwise drag the score considerably lower.

Birmingham's profile is anchored by its Set Pieces rating of 75.0, the highest of their six axes and well above the league average of 70.0, yet this advantage is offset by relatively weak Discipline at 62.5 — their lowest-ranked axis at 17th in the Championship against a league average of 68.1 — producing a modest Overall of 58.6 that reflects a team with a clear dead-ball strength undermined by costly indiscipline.

Al Shamal's Overall of 54.7 is propped up by elite attacking output (73.3, 2nd in the league) and strong form (60.0, 3rd), but dragged down significantly by a Discipline rating of just 33.3 — the worst in the league average comparison and 11th of 12 teams — which sits 23.7 points below their own Attack rating and nearly 24 points below the league's average discipline score of 57.

Rivers United's 54.7 Overall is pulled down primarily by a Defense rating of 66.7 that ranks just #6 of 8 in a league where the average defense sits at 78.1, making them one of the weakest defensive sides in a competition defined by strong defensive performances.

Brno's 55.3 Overall is propped up by standout Form (80.0, 2nd in the league) and Discipline (79.2, also 2nd), which offset a critically weak xG of 28.5 (12th) and Set Pieces of 37.5 (15th of 16, well below the league average of 59), creating a profile where strong recent results and clean conduct mask genuine attacking and dead-ball deficiencies.

Le Mans's Overall of 54.6 is propped up almost entirely by a league-best xG rating of 100.0—40+ points above the Ligue 1 average of 59.4—but that attacking threat is severely undermined by the worst Discipline score in the league (50.0 vs. a league average of 70.9, ranked #18 of 18) and a weak Set Pieces rating of 37.5 (ranked #15), dragging the average down considerably.

Zenit's profile is defined by a stark internal contrast: their Set Pieces rating of 87.5 (ranked 1st in the league, well above the league average of 54.2) is offset by a Discipline rating of just 33.3 (14th of 16, far below the league average of 47.9), and together these extremes pull the Overall score to a middling 54.6 that masks how polarised the team's actual strengths and weaknesses are.

Pisa's Overall of 55.3 is lifted primarily by an xG rating of 61.2 (3rd in Serie B, well above the league average of 42.0), signaling that their underlying attacking threat is the standout driver in a profile where most other axes sit closer to the league norm.

Granada's most distinctive quality is their Discipline rating of 70.0, which ranks 3rd in the league and sits 12.9 points above the Segunda División average of 57.1, making it the primary driver of their 53.5 Overall despite below-average Attack (40.0) and xG (38.3) numbers.

Sigma Olomouc's 64.3 Overall is driven by elite standings across Attack (73.3, 2nd), Defense (66.7, 2nd), and Form (80.0, 2nd), but dragged down notably by a weak xG of 45.9 and a Set Pieces rating of 50.0 (11th of 16), suggesting the club outperforms its underlying chance-creation metrics through efficiency or other factors rather than dominating in build-up quality or dead-ball situations.

Vitória SC's 54.1 Overall is propped up by elite set-piece and chance-creation strengths — ranking 2nd in Set Pieces (85.0, vs. a league average of 53.5) and 3rd in xG (56.2, vs. a league average of 35.5) — but dragged down sharply by a league-worst Attack rating of 20.0 (ranked 15th, vs. a league average of 43.3), revealing a team that generates quality situations yet fails to convert them into tangible attacking output.

Köln's Overall of 54.1 is buoyed primarily by an exceptional Set Pieces rating of 84.4 (ranked 4th in the Bundesliga, well above the league average of 66.7), which offsets notably weak Attack (50.0, 12th) and Defense (25.0, 12th) scores that would otherwise drag the team much lower.

Kasımpaşa's profile is defined by a sharp imbalance between their elite Defense (73.3, ranked 2nd in the league vs. a 49.6 average) and a weak Attack (40.0, below the 47.0 league average), making their 54 Overall a reflection of defensive solidity that only partially offsets their lack of attacking output.

Gimnasia Jujuy's Overall of 57.2 is driven primarily by elite Attack (60.0, ranked #2 in the league against a league average of just 30.4) and outstanding recent Form (73.3, ranked #3), which more than compensate for a below-average Defense rating of 60.0 that sits only 25th in a league where defending is the norm.

Golden Arrows' Overall of 55.9 is propped up by elite defensive and set-piece discipline — ranking #1 in Set Pieces (90.6 vs. the league average of 59.4) and #2 in Discipline (87.5 vs. 72.1) — but dragged down severely by a dead-last Attack (20.0 vs. league average 40.0) and last-place xG (17.5 vs. 36.4), revealing a team that excels at structured, low-event football while generating almost no attacking threat.

Elversberg's most glaring weakness is Set Pieces, where their 46.9 rating ranks just #14 of 18 and falls well below the league average of 67.5, dragging down an Overall of 53.8 that is otherwise buoyed by respectable Attack (66.7, #8) and strong Form (58.3, #5).

Sochaux's Overall of 53.4 is propped up almost entirely by an elite Defense rating of 93.3 (ranked 1st in Ligue 2, versus a league average of 58.2), which compensates for a severely weak Attack of just 20.0 and Set Pieces of 21.9, both ranked 16th — creating a profile defined by extreme imbalance between defensive solidity and offensive output.

Mirassol's profile is most defined by its stark internal contrast: their xG rating of 25.0 ranks 16th in the league and sits far below their own other axes, dragging down an Overall of 53.6 that would otherwise reflect their genuinely strong Set Pieces (80.0, 6th) and solid Defense (60.0, 5th).

Metz's profile is defined by a sharp internal split: their Defense rating of 73.3 (4th in Ligue 2, well above the league average of 58.2) anchors their 54.4 Overall, while their Attack and Form both sit at just 40.0, dragging the average down and reflecting a team that keeps games tight but struggles to generate or convert chances consistently.

Independ. Rivadavia's Overall of 53.4 is held back primarily by a Set Pieces rating of just 31.3 — dead last in the league (29th of 29) against a league average of 54.5 — which offsets what are otherwise strong Attack (60.0, 3rd) and Form (66.7, 2nd) scores.

Puebla's 58.7 Overall is lifted primarily by strong Discipline (72.2, 4th in Liga MX and well above the league average of 56.9) and solid Form (60.0, 5th in the league versus a league average of 46.7), which compensate for middling Attack (46.7, tied for 9th) and Defense (53.3, 9th) ratings.

Nautico Recife's Overall of 57.6 is lifted most by their Set Pieces rating of 75.0 — the highest of their six axes and 13 points above the Serie B average of 62.0 — which compensates for a below-average Defense of 53.3 that ranks just 14th in the league.

Rubin's 53.3 Overall is anchored by two notably strong pillars: a Defense rating of 66.7 (4th in the league, well above the 55.4 average) and a Discipline rating of 60.0 (3rd in the league, versus the 47.9 average), which offset a weak Attack of 46.7 and poor Set Pieces rank (11th) to produce a modest but above-average overall score.

St. Pauli's standout trait is their Set Pieces rating of 82.5, which ranks 4th in the league and sits 10.9 points above the 2. Bundesliga average of 71.6, making it by far their highest individual axis and the primary driver elevating their Overall score of 57.5 despite a weak Attack rating of 46.7 that ranks just 11th.

Dinamo Makhachkala's perfect xG score of 100.0 — the highest in the league and nearly double the league average of 52.2 — is the standout driver of their 62.2 Overall, compensating for a below-average Defense (46.7, ranked 11th) and weak Form (40.0) that would otherwise pull their rating down considerably.

Lommel United's profile is defined by a sharp imbalance between their elite Discipline (80.0, 2nd in the league vs. a 67.4 average) and a severely underpowered Attack (33.3, 13th in the league vs. a 49.6 average), meaning their Overall of 52.8 reflects a team that stays organized and avoids cards but lacks the offensive output to push meaningfully higher.

Colegiales's 56.1 Overall is anchored by a genuinely well-rounded profile that ranks in the top seven league-wide across every axis, but their Defense (80.0 vs. the league average of 69.8) and Form (66.7 vs. 44.9) are the axes that most meaningfully lift their score above a middling Attack of 40.0.

Almirante Brown's Overall of 57 is driven almost entirely by an elite Defense rating of 100.0 (ranked 1st of 36, well above the league average of 69.8), which compensates for a notably weak Attack of just 25.0—the team's only axis sitting below the league average of 30.4.

Levante's Overall of 52.7 is propped up by two outlier strengths—a league-best Discipline rating of 80.0 (ranked 1st) and an xG of 67.3 (ranked 3rd, well above the league average of 47.2)—which offset a weak Form of 33.3 and a poor Set Pieces score of 42.5 that drags against a league average of 59.4.

Botosani's 61.8 Overall is anchored by a league-best Defense rating of 86.7 (30 points above the Liga I average of 56.3), but significantly dragged down by a Discipline score of 41.7 that ranks dead last in the league against an average of 63.0, creating a profile where elite defensive solidity and poor disciplinary record pull the overall score in opposite directions.

Estudiantes' xG rating of 72.3 is by far their strongest axis — ranked 2nd in the league and nearly double the league average of 39.1 — yet their Attack sits at just 33.3 (17th), creating a stark efficiency paradox that pulls their Overall to a middling 52.6 despite exceptional underlying chance quality.

Bournemouth's xG rating of 72.0 is their standout strength — ranking 5th in the Premier League and sitting well above the league average of 50.8 — yet it cannot offset their poor Discipline (50.0, ranked 19th against a league average of 66.4) and weak Form (40.0, ranked 15th), which drag the Overall down to a middling 52.4.

Novi Pazar's Defense rating of 80.0 is by far their strongest axis — ranking 2nd in the league and sitting 22.4 points above the Super Liga average of 57.6 — and it is the primary driver lifting their Overall to 56.4 despite a low Attack of 40.0 and poor Discipline of 40.0.

Austin's profile is defined by a sharp internal imbalance: their Defense rating of 66.7 ranks 4th in MLS and sits 20 points above the league average of 46.7, yet their Attack (46.7, 15th) and xG (39.3, 20th) are both below-average, creating a defensive-first identity that lifts their Overall to 53.9 despite genuine attacking limitations.

Rodez's Overall of 54 is propped up by elite rankings in Set Pieces (87.5, #2 in Ligue 2) and Discipline (80.0, #1), which offset a Defense rating of just 26.7 that ranks 17th of 18 teams — the starkest internal contradiction in their profile.

Stevenage's most glaring anomaly is their xG rating of just 24.5, which ranks 22nd of 24 in League One despite their Attack rating of 66.7 ranking 6th — suggesting they are creating far fewer high-quality chances than their attacking output score implies, and this disconnect drags their Overall down to 55.3 despite otherwise top-half performances across most axes.

Pogon Szczecin's Defense rating of 73.3 — the best in the Ekstraklasa and 23 points above the league average of 50 — is the clear pillar of their profile, but it can only lift their Overall so far given that their xG (45.3, ranked 14th), Set Pieces (42.5, ranked 16th), and Discipline (53.3, ranked 16th) all drag well below the league averages, leaving the team's Overall at a modest 54.6.

Farul Constanta's Overall of 56.8 is propped up by an unusually strong defensive and disciplinary profile — ranking 4th in Defense (73.3 vs. the league average of 56.3) and 3rd in Discipline (75.0 vs. 63.0) — which compensates for a notably weak Attack of just 33.3, the 13th-lowest in Liga I against a league average of 45.4.

Belgrano Cordoba's profile is defined by a stark internal imbalance: their Set Pieces rating of 75.0 (4th in the league, well above the league average of 54.7) is their clear standout strength, yet it coexists with a very weak Attack (33.3, below the league average of 40.5) and xG (30.0, vs. league average 39.5), suggesting a team that generates danger primarily from dead-ball situations rather than open play, which limits their overall ceiling and anchors their Overall at 52.

Schalke's 52 Overall reflects a deeply lopsided profile: their Attack rating of just 25.0 (ranked 16th in the Bundesliga, well below the league average of 62) drags down an otherwise solid defensive and disciplinary foundation, where they rank 4th in Defense (66.7) and hold a respectable 70.8 in Discipline.

Atletico Paranaense's Overall of 51.9 reflects a stark internal imbalance: their Attack rating of 80.0 leads the entire league at #1, yet their Defense rating of just 20.0 ranks #19 of 20 and sits 31 points below the league average of 51.3, with those extremes largely cancelling each other out to produce a middling composite score.

Crewe's Overall of 56.2 is propped up by elite defensive solidity (73.3, ranked #2) and the division's best Discipline (86.7, ranked #1), which compensate for a severely underperforming Attack (33.3, ranked #17) and xG (34.7, ranked #19) that sit well below the League Two averages of 45 and 48.3 respectively.

Arsenal's Overall of 51.7 is held back primarily by their Attack rating of just 26.7, which ranks 16th in the Premier League and sits nearly 21 points below the league average of 47.9, dragging down what would otherwise be a more balanced profile anchored by their strong Discipline score of 77.8 (5th in the league).

Almería's Overall of 54.3 is propped up by genuine strengths in Attack (53.3, ranked 3rd) and Defense (73.3, ranked 8th), but dragged down sharply by an xG rating of just 29.3 — ranked 19th of 22 and well below the league average of 43 — suggesting their attacking output is not being backed by expected goals quality, creating a significant internal imbalance.

Vénus's Overall of 36.1 is dragged down almost entirely by their Attack (26.7, ranked 7th) and Form (6.7, ranked 7th) scores, which sit far below the league averages of 57 and 44.8 respectively, even as the club matches the league norm on xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline (all 50.0, ranked 1st).

Huracán's Overall of 51.6 is anchored by an elite Defense rating of 73.3 (3rd in the league, well above the 60.2 average), but that defensive strength is significantly undermined by a very weak xG of 30.2 (18th, nearly 9 points below the league average of 39.3), reflecting a team that limits opponents well yet struggles to generate genuine scoring opportunities.

Auxerre's Overall of 51.6 is severely dragged down by a Defense rating of 20.0—dead last in Ligue 1 and 31 points below the league average of 51.4—which offsets otherwise respectable scores in Set Pieces (71.9, 6th) and xG (60.3, 7th).

Lincoln's profile is defined by a stark internal contradiction: their Defense rating of 93.3 ranks 1st in the Championship and sits 40.5 points above the league average of 52.8, yet their Attack of 26.7 ranks 19th and their Set Pieces of 45.0 rank 22nd, leaving those defensive gains largely uncompensated and pulling the Overall down to 56.5.

Lille's Overall of 51.5 is dragged down primarily by their xG (42.3, ranked 13th) and Set Pieces (40.0, ranked 15th) ratings, both well below the league averages of 59.5 and 60.7 respectively, offsetting otherwise above-average marks in Attack (53.3, 6th) and Defense (53.3, 7th).

Vicenza Virtus's Overall of 54.2 is buoyed almost entirely by their Set Pieces rating of 87.5 — the highest in Serie B and 24.5 points above the league average — which offsets a severely weak Defense of 33.3 (18th of 20, well below the league average of 56.7).

Cracovia Krakow's Overall of 59.6 is propped up by a striking disconnect between their xG (76.0, 3rd in the league vs. a 55.4 average) and Set Pieces (85.0, 4th in the league vs. a 64.3 average) on one hand, and their weak Attack (46.7) and Defense (40.0) on the other — suggesting a team that creates quality chances and threatens at dead balls but fails to convert or hold leads consistently.

Vipers's Attack rating of 11.1 is dramatically below both their own Defense (77.8) and the league average (47.8), making them the weakest attacking side in the CAF Champions League (#5 of 5) and dragging their Overall down to 43.5 despite solid defensive and mid-table scores elsewhere.

Groningen's profile is defined by a striking internal imbalance: their Discipline rating of 83.3 (3rd in the Eredivisie, well above the league average of 73.6) stands in sharp contrast to their Defense score of just 26.7 and Form of 33.3, meaning their best asset is avoiding cards and infractions rather than winning matches or keeping goals out, which pulls their Overall up to a middling 51.4 despite genuine weakness in the performance-based axes.

Newells Old Boys own the league's best Defense rating (80.0, ranked #1 of 29, well above the 60.0 league average), yet that defensive dominance is severely undercut by bottom-tier Attack (33.3, #17) and Set Pieces (34.4, #26 of 29) ratings, pulling their Overall down to a modest 51.2.

Querétaro's defensive solidity (66.7, ranked 4th in Liga MX) and strong recent form (66.7, also 4th) underpin their 53.7 Overall, but a league-worst-tier Discipline score of 36.7 (15th of 17, versus the league average of 56.9) and weak Set Pieces rating of 50.0 (15th of 17, against a league average of 69.3) meaningfully drag that average down.

Servette's profile is defined by a stark internal contradiction: their Attack rating of 40.0 ranks dead last among the bottom three in the league (vs. a league average of 63.9), yet their Defense of 60.0 ranks 2nd in the Super League against a league average of just 35.6, making them an elite defensive unit that simply doesn't score enough to push their 55.1 Overall higher.

Newcastle's most glaring imbalance is their defense, rated just 40.0 against a league average of 54.5 and ranking 16th of 20, which drags down an Overall of 51.1 despite a respectable Attack of 60.0 that sits 7th in the league.

Famalicão's 51.1 Overall is anchored by an unusually strong defensive and set-piece profile — ranking 3rd in Defense (73.3 vs. a league average of 55.2) and 2nd in Set Pieces (75.0 vs. 51.9) — but is dragged down by a poor xG rating of 21.3 (12th, well below the league average of 32.8) and weak Form of 40.0, reflecting a team that suppresses opponents and exploits dead-ball situations yet struggles to generate quality open-play chances.

Panetolikos's Overall of 55.5 is buoyed by genuine strengths across Attack (58.3, #4), Defense (66.7, #5), and especially Form (75.0, #3), but their Set Pieces rating of just 28.1 — ranked #13 of 14 and far below the league average of 51.5 — acts as a significant drag that prevents a higher Overall score.

Alavés's profile is defined by a stark contradiction between elite defending (66.7, 2nd in La Liga, well above the 44.9 league average) and a critically low xG of 27.0 (17th of 19, versus the 47.0 league average), meaning they suppress opponents effectively but generate so little attacking threat that their Overall is dragged down to just 50.9.

Gimnasia M.'s Overall of 50.7 is anchored by a glaring weakness in xG (24.0, ranked 24th of 29 and well below the league average of 39.0), which drags down an otherwise respectable attacking profile where they rank 6th in Attack (53.3) — suggesting they create chances far less efficiently than their attacking rank implies.

Sport Recife's Overall 59.1 is anchored by standout Discipline (75.0, 5th in the league vs. a 64.6 average) and solid xG (58.7, 6th vs. a 42.4 league average), but is dragged down by a weak Form rating of 40.0 — their lowest axis and 15th in the division — which prevents an otherwise above-average profile from rating higher.

Atlanta United's Overall rating of 53.2 is propped up almost entirely by their elite Set Pieces score of 85.0 (2nd in MLS, well above the league average of 64.2), which offsets notably weak Attack (40.0, ranked 18th) and Form (33.3, ranked 16th) figures that would otherwise drag the team much lower.

Stuttgart's xG rating of 26.3 ranks 16th of 18 in the Bundesliga and sits 30+ points below the league average of 56.7, making it the team's most glaring weakness and the primary drag pulling their Overall down to 50.6 despite a relatively solid Discipline score of 75.0 and Set Pieces rating of 68.8.

Napoli's Discipline rating of 83.3 (ranked 2nd in Serie A, well above the league average of 70.9) is by far their strongest axis, but it cannot compensate for severely below-average Attack (33.3, vs. league average 44.6) and Form (26.7, vs. league average 41.8), which drag the simple average down to an Overall of 50.6.

Phoenix Rising's standout strength is their Form rating of 73.3 — 29.1 points above the league average of 44.2 and ranked 3rd in the USL Championship — which, combined with above-average Attack (66.7, 7th) and Defense (60.0, 9th), drives their Overall of 58.3 well clear of the league mean despite mid-table scores in xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline.

Sacramento Republic's Overall of 53.9 is anchored by a standout Defense rating of 73.3 (3rd in the league, well above the 50.5 average), which compensates for an Attack of just 40.0 that ranks only 13th and sits nearly 9 points below the league average of 48.6.

Minnesota United's 57.5 Overall is defined almost entirely by the extreme tension between their perfect 100.0 scores in both Attack and xG (ranked 1st in MLS on both axes) and their last-place 0.0 in Defense (ranked 30th of 30), with the latter single-handedly dragging the average down from what would otherwise be a dominant profile.

Akhmat's Overall of 53.8 is pulled upward by a league-leading Attack rating of 73.3 — 26 points above the league average of 47.1 — but that dominance is offset by a very weak xG of 38.0 (13th of 16, versus a league average of 52.2) and a poor Defense of 46.7 (12th of 16), suggesting the attack generates chances that don't translate into expected goals while the backline remains a significant vulnerability.

Chapecoense-sc's 50.4 Overall is shaped by a stark internal split: their xG rating of 57.5 ranks 5th in the league and sits well above their own Attack score of 40.0 (12th), suggesting they generate quality chances but fail to convert them, while their Set Pieces (55.0) and Discipline (50.0) both trail the league averages of 67.7 and 57.7 respectively, dragging the overall figure down despite respectable defensive and form rankings.

Aalesund's profile is defined by a violent internal split: their Attack rating of 86.7 ranks 4th in the league and sits 27 points above the league average, yet their Defense of 20.0 ranks 12th and is 21 points below the league average, a contradiction that pulls their Overall down to a middling 56.7 despite genuine attacking quality.

Frankfurt's Defense rating of 16.7 is the dominant drag on their Overall 50.3, ranking 15th of 18 in the Bundesliga and sitting 22 points below the league average of 38.9, more than offsetting their sole above-average axis in Attack (75.0, versus a league mean of 63.6).

Hoffenheim's 50.3 Overall is anchored by a glaring internal contradiction: their Set Pieces rating of 93.8 (3rd in the Bundesliga, well above the league average of 67.5) is the one elite bright spot propping up a profile otherwise dragged down by bottom-quartile scores in Defense (20.0, ranked 14th), Form (20.0, ranked 16th), and Attack (46.7, ranked 14th).

Cruzeiro's Overall of 50.1 is dragged down sharply by an xG rating of just 21.0 (ranked 17th of 20, versus the league average of 48.4) and a Set Pieces score of 43.8 (ranked 18th of 20, against the league average of 66.5), which offset what are otherwise genuinely strong Attack (66.7, 3rd) and Form (60.0, 4th) ratings.

Central Cordoba de Santiago's Overall of 50.1 is propped up almost entirely by elite Set Pieces (90.0, ranked 2nd of 29) and strong Discipline (76.7, also 2nd of 29), which offset severely below-average Attack (26.7, 20th) and a near-bottom Form rating (13.3, 27th) that would otherwise drag them much lower.

Brann's profile is defined by a stark internal contradiction: their Set Pieces rating of 95.8 (2nd in the league, well above the 69.6 league average) is offset by a near-bottom xG of 24.7 (15th of 16, versus a league average of 58.7), reflecting a team that converts dead-ball situations effectively but generates very little open-play attacking threat, leaving their Overall at a middling 53.6.

Werder Bremen's Overall of 49.9 is anchored by a severe xG rating of just 18.0 (dead last in the Bundesliga, against a league average of 56.7), which drags down an otherwise respectable profile that includes the second-best Discipline score in the division (79.2) and a top-five Form rating (58.3).

RB Bragantino's Overall of 49.7 is anchored by a standout Set Pieces rating of 82.5 (5th in the league, well above the league average of 66.5), but this strength is undercut by a Form score of just 26.7 and a Discipline rating of 46.7, both ranking 15th of 20, dragging the average down significantly.

Tigres UANL's Overall of 56.5 is anchored by a league-best Defense (80.0, ranked #1 of 17, well above the Liga MX average of 54.9) and a strong xG of 57.0 (ranked #2), but these are dragged down significantly by an Attack rating of just 26.7 — the third-lowest axis in their own profile and 20 points below the league average of 46.7 — creating a lopsided profile where defensive solidity and underlying chance quality outpace their actual attacking output.

Tristán Suárez's Overall of 53.9 is anchored almost entirely by an elite Defense rating of 86.7 (3rd in the league, well above the 69.8 average), which compensates for a very low Attack of 33.3 that, despite ranking 10th, still reflects a limited offensive output.

Indy Eleven's Overall of 55 is driven almost entirely by their Attack rating of 73.3 — ranked 3rd in the league and 20 points above the USL Championship average of 48.6 — as their remaining axes (Defense 53.3, Form 53.3, xG/Set Pieces/Discipline all at 50.0) are clustered near league norms and pull the average back toward the middle.

Fleetwood's Overall of 55 is anchored by an elite Defense rating of 73.3 (2nd in League Two, well above the 55.0 league average), but that strength is partially offset by a poor Discipline score of 53.3 (22nd in the league against a 65.8 average) and a weak Attack of 40.0, leaving the team's ceiling limited despite their defensive solidity.

Monza's 49.4 Overall is held back primarily by a Defense rating of just 20.0 — ranked 17th of 19 in Serie A and far below the league average of 51.2 — which drags down an otherwise above-average attacking profile highlighted by an xG of 66.0 (3rd in the league).

Çorum FK's profile is defined by a striking imbalance between their Attack (73.3, 4th in the league, well above the 48.5 average) and their Defense (33.3, 13th, well below the 47.4 average), a gulf that pulls their Overall down to a middling 49.2 despite genuine offensive quality.

Gaborone United's 49.1 Overall is dragged down primarily by a Defense rating of 55.6, which ranks last (5th of 5) in the CAF Champions League against a league average of 78.3, offsetting otherwise mid-table or joint-leading scores across their other five axes.

Las Palmas's 53.2 Overall is lifted primarily by their Form rating of 66.7 (3rd in the division, well above the league average of 46.1), which offsets a notably weak xG of 33.3 that ranks 17th of 22 and sits 9.7 points below the league mean.

Tottenham's Overall of 49 is dragged down by league-worst-tier Attack (13.3, ranked #19) and Form (13.3, ranked #19) scores that offset an otherwise striking profile anchored by a perfect 100.0 in Set Pieces (#1 in the league) and an 83.3 in Discipline (#1 in the league), creating an unusually polarized team that excels in structured, tactical phases while badly underperforming in live attacking output and recent results.

Alverca's profile is defined by a stark internal contradiction: despite ranking 4th in the league for both Set Pieces (62.5) and Discipline (70.8), their xG rating of just 13.7 ranks 16th of 18 — nearly 20 points below the league average of 32.8 — revealing a team that stays organized and wins dead-ball situations but generates almost no open-play expected goals, which drags their Overall down to 49.

Crystal Palace's Overall of 49 is dragged down primarily by a glaring disconnect between their Attack (66.7, ranked 4th) and their xG (22.0, ranked 19th of 20), suggesting the team creates chances that significantly underperform expected metrics, while their Defense (40.0, ranked 16th) further limits their ceiling despite the attacking talent on paper.

AIK's most distinctive feature is their poor Discipline rating of 61.1 (ranked 14th of 16), which sits 11.5 points below the Allsvenskan average of 72.6 and drags down an Overall of 56.5 that would otherwise be buoyed by their relatively strong xG of 63.7, the team's highest individual axis and good for 5th in the league.

Independiente's Overall of 48.9 is dragged down primarily by a league-worst-tier xG of 20.5 (ranked 27th of 29, nearly half the league average of 39.5) and an Attack rating of 26.7 (ranked 21st, well below the league average of 40.5), meaning their respectable defensive and discipline scores of 66.7 cannot compensate for a severe lack of attacking output and chance creation.

Remo's 48.7 Overall is dragged down by severe weakness across Attack (33.3, ranked 15th), Defense (33.3, ranked 18th), Form (0.0, ranked last), and Discipline (45.8, ranked 17th), which offset a genuinely elite xG of 95.3 (3rd in the league) and strong Set Pieces rating of 84.4 (4th)—a rare profile where the team generates high-quality chances on paper but lacks the results, defensive solidity, and consistency to convert that into a better overall standing.

Colchester's Overall of 55.8 is propped up almost entirely by an exceptional Discipline rating of 86.7 — ranked 1st in League Two and nearly 21 points above the league average of 65.8 — which compensates for a weak Attack of just 33.3, the team's clear weakest axis and well below the league average of 45.

Avellino's Overall of 54 is anchored by a strong Defense rating of 75.0 (2nd in Serie B, well above the league average of 56.7), but is dragged down significantly by a Set Pieces score of just 33.3, the second-worst in the division (19th of 20) against a league average of 63.0, creating a wide internal gap that keeps the club's average modest despite their defensive quality.

St Mirren's Overall 54 is anchored by genuine strengths in Defense (60.0, 3rd in the league) and xG (61.3, 5th), but their Set Pieces rating of 52.5 stands out as their weakest axis and sits well below the league average of 71.3, dragging the overall average down despite their solid defensive and chance-creation profile.

Trabzonspor's attack (66.7, ranked 5th) is genuinely strong relative to the league average of 48.5, but their Overall of 48.2 is dragged down sharply by a Discipline rating of just 26.7 — ranked 17th of 18 and far below the league average of 58.0 — which nearly cancels out their offensive advantage.

Academico Viseu's Overall of 47.9 is dragged down primarily by their Set Pieces rating of 32.5 (ranked 15th) and Discipline rating of 37.5 (ranked 17th), which fall well below the league averages of 51.9 and 59.9 respectively, offsetting an otherwise competitive profile that includes a 4th-place Form rating of 66.7 and above-average standings in Attack, Defense, and xG.

Chicago Fire's Overall of 56.7 is propped up by standout ratings in Set Pieces (78.1, 5th in MLS) and Discipline (75.0, 4th in MLS), both well above the league averages of 64.2, compensating for a Defense rating of just 33.3 (22nd) and a Form rating of 26.7 (23rd) that are among the worst in the league.

Rizespor's profile is defined by a sharp split between a strong Defense rating of 60.0 (5th in the league, well above the 47.4 average) and a notably weak Attack of 40.0 (11th, below the 48.5 average), with Set Pieces ranking 15th at just 40.6 against a league average of 55.2, leaving the team's Overall at a modest 47.8 despite its defensive solidity.

Udinese's 47.4 Overall is pulled down primarily by a glaring weakness in Defense (26.7, ranked 16th of 19, well below the league average of 51.2), which offsets their genuine strength in Set Pieces (68.8, ranked 4th of 19, and notably above the league average of 56.0).

Gaziantep FK's Overall of 47.4 is anchored by a genuine defensive strength — their Defense rating of 60.0 ranks 5th in the Süper Lig and sits well above the league average of 47.4 — but this is severely undercut by an xG of just 31.1 (15th of 18, versus the league average of 45.8), reflecting a team that keeps games tight at the back while generating very little in the way of quality attacking chances.

Rewa's Overall of 47.2 is dragged down almost entirely by their Defense rating of 16.7—ranked 7th of 8 and more than 24 points below the league average of 40.8—offsetting an otherwise competitive profile that includes the joint-best Attack in the tournament at 66.7.

Annecy's Overall of 55.5 is lifted primarily by a standout Set Pieces rating of 75.0 (3rd in Ligue 2, well above the league average of 56.6), which compensates for a below-average Defense (53.3, 11th) and a weak Attack (46.7), keeping the club's average comfortably above the mid-table baseline.

Toti City's profile is defined by a sharp internal imbalance: their Attack (66.7) is nearly double their Defense (33.3) and Form (33.3), pulling the Overall to 47.2 despite those weak axes dragging the average down from what their offensive output alone would suggest.

Tenerife's Overall of 56.4 is propped up by elite defensive (80.0, 4th) and form (66.7, 3rd) ratings, but severely dragged down by an xG of just 31.0 — 18th of 22 and well below the league average of 43 — revealing a team that wins and defends well but generates remarkably little genuine attacking threat by the numbers.

Toulouse's profile is dragged down most severely by an xG rating of 38.0 (ranked 15th of 18, well below the league average of 58.4), signaling chronic underperformance in expected goals that offsets their relative strength in Discipline (70.8) and keeps their Overall at a modest 47.

Racing Club's most glaring weakness is their Defense rating of 40.0, ranking 27th of 29 teams in a league where the average is 60.2, and this 20-point deficit below the league mean is the primary drag pulling their Overall down to 46.9 despite respectable xG (48.7, 7th) and Discipline (66.7, 6th) scores.

Hull City's Overall of 46.9 is dragged down most severely by a last-place Discipline rating of 43.3 (vs. a league average of 66.3) and a near-last Set Pieces score of 42.5 (ranked 19th, vs. a league average of 61.2), which together offset their genuinely strong Defense of 73.3 (4th in the league).

Guingamp's profile is defined by a sharp internal imbalance: their Attack (53.3, ranked 3rd in Ligue 2) and xG (50.0, ranked 1st) point to genuine offensive threat, while their Set Pieces rating (46.9, ranked 14th) drags well below their own averages and the league mean of 56.6, keeping their Overall at a modest 53.9.

KV Mechelen's Overall of 46.6 is dragged down by severely below-average Attack (13.3, ranked #17) and Form (13.3, ranked #16) ratings, which offset the team's genuinely strong xG (70.3, #4) and Set Pieces (84.4, #4) scores — a rare split suggesting they create and threaten well structurally but are failing to convert that into results.

Aston Villa's xG rating of 11.0 is by far their weakest dimension — dead last in the Premier League at #20 of 20 and nearly 40 points below the league average of 50.8 — dragging their Overall down to 46.3 despite relatively steadier marks across their other five axes.

Istra 1961's Overall of 58.1 is lifted primarily by a league-leading Attack rating of 66.7 (ranked 2nd in HNL, well above the league average of 47.3) and a strong Discipline score of 73.3, which together offset their weakest axis, Set Pieces at 47.5 (ranked 6th), where they actually fall below the league average of 52.7.

Nottingham Forest's 45.9 Overall is anchored almost entirely by their Defense rating of 66.7 (7th in the league, well above the 55.3 average), which offsets an otherwise weak profile where Attack (26.7, 17th), Form (33.3, 16th), and Set Pieces (42.5, 19th) all rank near the bottom of the Premier League.

Fulham's Overall rating of 45.8 is dragged down primarily by a Form score of just 13.3 (ranked 19th of 20, well below the league average of 47.7), which offsets their genuine strengths in Set Pieces (70.0, 5th) and Discipline (73.3, 6th) — both well above their own team average and the league norms.

Atlético Tucumán's Overall of 45.8 is propped up almost entirely by its defensive strength — a 73.3 Defense rating that ranks 3rd in the league against a league average of 60.2 — which offsets a severely weak Attack (20.0, ranked 25th) and xG (24.0, ranked 23rd) that both sit roughly half the league averages of 40.5 and 39.3 respectively.

Nice's Overall of 45.4 is dragged down primarily by a historically poor Attack rating of 20.0—dead last in Ligue 1 against a league average of 47.4—and an xG of just 26.0 (17th of 18), meaning their solid defensive foundation (60.0, 5th) and respectable Discipline (70.8) cannot compensate for an almost total lack of attacking output.

PEC Zwolle's Overall of 45.4 is dragged down primarily by a Defense rating of 0.0 (ranked #16) and an Attack of 33.3 (ranked #16), which more than offset their surprisingly strong xG of 67.7 (ranked #5 in the league), creating a profile where underlying chance creation far outpaces their actual attacking and defensive output.

OH Leuven's most striking anomaly is their xG rating of 63.0 (5th in the league, well above the 54.3 average), which sits in sharp contrast to their Attack rating of just 26.7 (15th) and Form of 26.7 (13th), suggesting the team is generating quality chances but failing to convert or accumulate results, and this disconnect between underlying chance quality and actual output drags their Overall down to a modest 45.4.

Rahimo's Overall of 45.4 is dragged down primarily by their Attack (33.3, ranked 8th in the league versus a 46.1 average) and Defense (44.4, ranked 10th), which offset their league-leading xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline ratings (all 50.0, each ranked 1st of 12).

Strasbourg's Attack rating of 66.7 ranks 3rd in Ligue 1 and sits well above the league average of 47.4, but this attacking strength is undermined by bottom-tier ratings in xG (33.5, ranked 16th), Set Pieces (28.1, ranked 17th), and Defense (33.3, ranked 15th), creating a lopsided profile that drags their Overall down to 45.1.

Torino's Overall of 45.1 is propped up almost entirely by their Discipline rating of 86.7 — ranked 1st in Serie A and nearly 16 points above the league average of 70.9 — masking a profile that is otherwise below-average across every other axis, including a Set Pieces rating of just 42.5 (17th of 19) and an xG of 34.8 (14th of 19).

Exeter City's Overall of 53.2 is propped up almost entirely by an elite Defense rating of 73.3 (2nd in League Two, well above the 55 league average), which compensates for a severely lagging Attack of just 26.7 (21st of 24, against a 45 league average) — a team built to keep goals out rather than score them.

Fluminense's Overall of 44.9 is dragged down sharply by historically weak xG (18.7, ranked last in the league against a 47.7 average) and Set Pieces (27.5, also last against a 66.0 average), which offset what are otherwise genuinely strong Attack (#6), Defense (#5), and Form (#4) rankings.

Plzen's Overall of 60.5 is driven primarily by elite Attack (73.3, ranked 2nd) and Defense (66.7, ranked 2nd) ratings that sit well above the league averages of 47.5 and 55.0 respectively, while their Discipline score of 58.3 (ranked 12th) is the one axis where they fall below the league average of 61.7, moderating what would otherwise be an even higher overall mark.

Fiorentina's Overall of 44.7 is held back primarily by a Defense rating of just 20.0 — ranking 17th of 19 in Serie A and sitting 31.2 points below the league average of 51.2 — which drags the average down despite a comparatively strong xG of 56.4 (5th in the league), revealing a team that creates chances but concedes far too easily.

Gil Vicente's Overall of 44.6 is dragged down primarily by an Attack rating of just 26.7 — ranking 14th in the league and sitting 15.9 points below the Primeira Liga average of 42.6 — which offsets otherwise solid defensive and disciplinary ratings of 66.7 on both axes (7th and 5th in the league, respectively).

Aldosivi's profile is defined by a striking imbalance: despite ranking 3rd in Attack (60.0, well above the league average of 40.5), they rank 28th in Defense (33.3, versus the league average of 60.2) and 26th in xG (20.8, against a league average of 39.3), meaning their offensive output doesn't translate into genuine chance creation and their defensive fragility drags their Overall down to 44.6.

Paderborn's Overall of 44.6 is dragged down primarily by a league-worst-tier Attack (25.0, ranked #16) and xG (24.3, ranked #17) that sit far below the Bundesliga averages of 62 and 56.7 respectively, offsetting the team's genuine strengths in Discipline (72.2, #7) and Defense (58.3, #6) — a profile that reflects a side capable of limiting opponents but severely lacking in attacking and chance-creation quality.

Lorient's Overall of 44.2 is dragged down primarily by a Set Pieces rating of just 28.1 (ranked 17th of 18, well below the league average of 60.3) and a weak Attack of 33.3 (ranked 14th), which offset their genuine strengths in Defense (60.0, 5th) and Discipline (72.2, 7th).

Sevilla's Overall of 44 is dragged down primarily by their Attack (33.3, ranked 15th) and xG (30.0, also ranked 15th) scores, both sitting far below the league averages of 50.2 and 47.2 respectively, revealing a team that struggles to create and convert chances despite showing relative stability in Defense (53.3, 8th) and Form (46.7, 6th).

Beveren's xG rating of 23.2 ranks 17th of 18 in the league—far below even their own already-low Attack score of 33.3—indicating a severe lack of quality chances created that drags their Overall down to 44, partially offset by a relatively strong Set Pieces score of 67.5 (6th in the league).

Cercle Brugge's Overall of 43.8 is dragged down by severe weaknesses across Attack (20.0, #16), Form (6.7, #17), and xG (37.5, #15), but their standout Set Pieces rating of 85.0 (#2 in the league, well above the 59.8 average) prevents the score from falling even lower, highlighting a team that struggles to generate and convert open-play chances yet excels in dead-ball situations.

Sarmiento Junin's most glaring weakness is their Set Pieces rating of 32.5, which ranks dead last in the Liga Profesional (29th of 29) against a league average of 55.0, and this floor drags their Overall down to 43.7 despite relatively balanced mid-table scores across their other axes.

Coritiba's Overall of 43.7 is dragged down almost entirely by their Defense rating of 13.3 — dead last in Serie A at #20 of 20 and nearly 38 points below the league average of 51.3 — which offsets an otherwise competitive Attack of 60.0 (4th in the league) and leaves the team fundamentally unbalanced.

Sparta Rotterdam's Overall of 43.7 is dragged down by historically weak Defense (0.0, ranked #16) and poor Form (13.3, ranked #14), despite being the league's most disciplined side (83.3, ranked #1) and boasting elite set-piece ratings (84.4, ranked #3)—the gulf between those extremes defines their profile.

Tiga Sport's Overall of 43.5 is dragged down almost entirely by a league-worst Attack rating of 11.1—nearly 46 points below the league average of 57—which offsets their league-leading Defense of 66.7 and prevents what is otherwise a well-rounded profile from translating into a higher score.

Atalanta's Overall of 43.3 is dragged down primarily by a Set Pieces rating of 40.0 that ranks dead last in Serie A against a league average of 56.0, compounded by an xG of 22.4 (17th of 19, versus a league average of 45.6) and an Attack of 26.7 (15th of 19), leaving their solid Discipline (70.8) and Defense (60.0) unable to compensate.

Rayo Vallecano's Overall of 43 is dragged down primarily by a catastrophic Defense rating of 13.3 — ranked 18th of 19 in La Liga and less than a third of the league average of 45.3 — which offsets otherwise respectable showings in Attack (60.0, 6th) and Set Pieces (68.8, 7th).

Vitória's Overall of 42.8 is dragged down by an xG rating of just 19.3 (19th of 20, well below the league average of 47.7), reflecting a team that creates almost no quality chances, though their Set Pieces rating of 77.5 (7th of 20, above the league average of 66.0) stands out as a rare bright spot in an otherwise bottom-tier profile.

Talleres Córdoba's Overall of 42.8 is dragged down by below-league-average scores across most axes, but their profile is defined by a stark internal contrast: Set Pieces is their clear standout at 60.0 (ranked 8th of 29), while Discipline is their weakest link at just 43.3 (ranked 26th of 29), sitting 16.7 points below the league average of 60.0 and undermining whatever dead-ball advantage they might otherwise leverage.

Racing Santander's Overall of 42.6 is dragged down almost entirely by a Defense rating of 0.0 — dead last in La Liga at #19 of 19 and a full 45.3 points below the league average — which offsets otherwise respectable Attack (60.0, #6) and xG (57.3, #6) scores that suggest genuine offensive capability.

Lecce's overall of 42.5 is dragged down primarily by their Attack (33.3) and Defense (33.3), both well below the Serie A averages of 44.6 and 51.2 respectively, with their Discipline rating of 66.7 standing as their only above-average axis and masking just how weak their on-pitch performance metrics are across the board.

Willem II's Overall of 42.4 is dragged down by severely weak Attack (26.7, ranked #16) and Form (13.3, ranked #14) ratings, yet their xG (56.7, #8) and Set Pieces (62.5, #9) sit close to or above the league averages of 49.5 and 61.1 respectively, suggesting the team creates reasonable opportunities but fails to convert or win consistently enough to lift their overall standing.

Internacional's most glaring weakness is Discipline, where their rating of 37.5 ranks dead last (20th of 20) in Serie A against a league average of 55.8, dragging down an Overall of 42.4 that is further undermined by a poor Set Pieces score of 46.9 (17th of 20, well below the league average of 66) — two axes that collectively offset their relative strength in xG (56.3, 6th of 20).

Elche's Attack rating of 66.7 ranks 3rd in La Liga and sits well above the league average of 50.2, yet this offensive strength is undermined by a Defense rating of just 26.7 (15th) and a Discipline score of 43.3 (17th, versus the league average of 59.1), dragging the overall average down to 42.1 despite the team's rare attacking quality.

Arouca's Overall 42 is dragged down primarily by a Set Pieces rating of 32.5 (ranked 15th of 18, nearly 20 points below the league average of 51.9), which compounds already below-average Attack (33.3) and Form (33.3) scores, leaving Discipline (63.3) and Defense (53.3) as the only axes near or above league norms.

Botafogo's Overall of 41.9 is dragged down by chronically weak attacking output (26.7, ranked 18th) and poor xG conversion (28.0), but their Discipline rating of 66.7 — third-best in the league against a league average of 55.8 — stands as a genuine outlier that partially offsets those deficiencies and prevents an even lower score.

Bologna's Overall of 41.6 is dragged down primarily by a catastrophic Attack rating of 20.0 (ranked 18th of 19, vs. the league average of 44.6) and a near-bottom Form of 13.3 (ranked 17th), which overwhelm their respectable Defense (60.0, 7th) and Discipline (73.3, 6th) when averaged together.

Göztepe's attacking metrics are genuinely strong — ranking 6th in Attack (53.3 vs. league average 48.5), 5th in xG (57.8 vs. 45.8), and 6th in Set Pieces (57.5) — but their Overall of 41.4 is dragged down sharply by a dead-last Form rating of 13.3 (ranked 18th of 18) and a near-bottom Defense of 20.0 (ranked 16th, vs. league average 47.4), meaning they create well but concede freely and have been losing consistently.

Le Havre's Overall of 41.4 is dragged down primarily by a last-place xG rating of 21.5 (against a league average of 58.4) and near-bottom Form of 13.3 (#17 of 18), exposing a team that struggles to generate expected goals and has been badly out of form, despite a respectable Set Pieces score of 70.0 (#6 in the league) that stands as their lone genuine strength.

Samsunspor's 41.3 Overall is dragged down by historically weak attacking output—ranked dead last in the league on xG (19.7 vs. a 45.8 league average) and 15th or worse in Attack (20.0) and Form (20.0)—offset only partially by a league-best Discipline score of 91.7, which alone lifts the average but cannot compensate for the team's near-bottom performance across every productivity axis.

Braunschweig's Overall of 55.2 is dragged down despite elite attacking output — ranking 1st in the league in xG (83.8) and 4th in Attack (80.0) — by a near-bottom Defense rating of 20.0 (16th of 18), creating a lopsided profile where the team generates chances at the league's highest rate but concedes far too freely to convert that threat into a stronger overall score.

Kalmar FF's 57.3 Overall is shaped by a stark internal split: their Defense (80.0, 2nd in the league) and Discipline (83.3, also 2nd) rank among Allsvenskan's best, yet their Form rating of just 26.7 ranks 15th of 16, dragging the average down despite a genuinely strong defensive foundation.

Başakşehir's Overall of 41.1 is dragged down primarily by their Defense (26.7, ranked #14) and Form (26.7, ranked #13), both of which sit roughly 20 points below the league averages of 47.4 and 45.6 respectively, offsetting what is otherwise a respectable Attack (53.3, #6) and xG (48.4, #6) that rank in the top third of the Süper Lig.

Barracas Central's Overall 41 reflects a team of sharp contradictions: their Defense rating of 73.3 (3rd in the league, well above the 60.2 average) is undermined by an Attack of just 13.3 (27th of 29, versus a league average of 40.5) and a Form of 20.0 (26th), meaning elite defensive solidity cannot compensate for one of the league's most toothless and out-of-form attacks.

Tigre's 40.9 Overall is dragged down by chronic weaknesses across nearly every axis, but Set Pieces (37.5, ranked #24) and Form (26.7, ranked #23) are the standout liabilities — both sitting well below even their own modest Attack rating of 33.3 and far short of the league averages of 54.7 and 44.4 respectively, leaving the team with no single compensating strength.

Erzurumspor's Overall of 40.9 is dragged down primarily by a historically weak Attack (20.0, ranked 15th) and xG (21.0, ranked 17th of 18) — both less than half the league averages of 48.5 and 45.8 respectively — while their Discipline rating of 73.3 (5th in the league) stands out as a genuine strength that prevents an even lower score.

Cambuur's Overall of 40.4 is dragged down primarily by a glaring weakness in Set Pieces (34.4, ranked #16 of 18 against a league average of 61.1) and xG (23.8, ranked #15 of 18 against a league average of 49.5), which offset their lone relative strength in Attack (60.0, #8), leaving them well below mid-table across most axes.

JS Saoura's Overall of 38 is dragged down sharply by historically weak Attack (22.2, #9) and Defense (22.2, #12 of 12—well below the league average of 71.1) ratings, which offset their perfectly average xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline scores of 50.0 that rank joint-first in the competition.

Ipswich's xG rating of 60.0 — their highest axis by a wide margin and ranked 6th in the Premier League — stands in stark contrast to their Attack rating of 33.3 and Defense of 26.7, suggesting they create reasonable scoring chances but lack the finishing and defensive solidity to convert that potential into results, dragging their Overall down to 40.2.

Fortuna Sittard's Overall of 40.2 is dragged down most severely by their Set Pieces rating of 22.5 (dead last in the Eredivisie, versus a league average of 61.1) and an xG of 22.0 (16th of 18, against a league average of 49.5), meaning that despite a respectable Form rank of 6th, their inability to convert chances or threaten from dead-ball situations undermines nearly every other positive in their profile.

Casa Pia's Overall of 40.1 is dragged down primarily by a league-worst-tier Attack rating of just 20.0 (ranked 15th of 18, versus the league average of 42.6), which offsets their relative strengths in Discipline (66.7, 5th) and Set Pieces (55.0, 8th) — the two axes where they actually exceed or approach league norms.

Nsingizini Hotspurs' Overall of 39.8 is severely dragged down by a historically anomalous Attack rating of 0.0 (dead last among all 12 teams, versus a league average of 46.1) and a near-bottom Form of 11.1, which overwhelm an otherwise respectable Defense of 77.8 and league-average scores across xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline.

Parma's xG rating of 20.0 ranks 18th of 19 in Serie A and sits 25.6 points below the league average of 45.6, making their chronic underperformance in expected goals the single sharpest drag pulling their Overall down to 39.5.

Mönchengladbach's Overall of 39.4 is dragged down by basement-level ratings in Defense (0.0, #16), Form (0.0, #18), and Discipline (50.0, #16), which overwhelm their league-best Set Pieces score of 100.0 (#1 of 18) when averaged across all six axes.

Valencia's 39.2 Overall reflects a team dragged down by historically low Attack (26.7, ranked 16th) and Form (20.0, ranked 18th) ratings that sit far below the league averages of 50.2 and 44.6 respectively, with only Discipline (66.7) and Set Pieces (55.0) approaching league-typical levels to prevent an even lower score.

Gençlerbirliği's Overall of 38.8 is dragged down by severely weak Attack (20.0, #15) and Defense (20.0, #16) ratings that sit far below the league averages of 48.5 and 47.4, and these low scores overwhelm the team's genuinely above-average strengths in Set Pieces (65.0, #4) and Discipline (66.7, #6).

Medeama's Overall of 38 is dragged down by severely weak Attack (22.2 vs. a league average of 46.1, ranked 9th) and especially poor Form (11.1 vs. a league average of 52.6, ranked 11th), which offset their league-leading scores in xG, Set Pieces, and Discipline — creating an unusually split profile where their process metrics are average or better but their output and recent results are among the worst in the CAF Champions League.

Espanyol's 37.8 Overall is dragged down across the board, but their Set Pieces rating of 37.5 (ranked 18th of 19, against a league average of 59.9) represents their starkest weakness, sitting 22.4 points below the La Liga norm and compounding an already-poor xG of 25.7 (17th of 19) to leave the club with almost no reliable route to goal creation.

Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto's Overall of 37.3 is dragged down primarily by a league-worst-tier Attack (20.0, ranked #25) and near-bottom Form (13.3, ranked #27), both far below league averages of 40.5 and 44.4 respectively, with their relatively bright spot of Set Pieces (59.4, ranked #10) doing little to offset such severe offensive and momentum deficits.

NEC Nijmegen's Overall of 37.2 is dragged down by bottom-tier ratings in Attack (26.7, #16), Defense (6.7, #15), and Form (13.3, #14), but the team's most striking anomaly is their xG rating of 64.7 (#5 in the league), which sits well above the league average of 49.5 and suggests they are generating genuine scoring opportunities that their low Attack rating indicates they are badly failing to convert.

RAAL La Louvière's xG rating of 54.0 stands as their sole above-average metric and ranks 8th in the league, yet it cannot offset the severe drag from rock-bottom finishes in Set Pieces (30.0, ranked 18th) and near-bottom marks in Defense (33.3, 17th) and Discipline (43.3, 17th), pulling their Overall down to 36.8.

Maritimo's Discipline rating of 66.7 (5th in the league) stands as their sole above-average axis and towers over their other ratings, particularly their abysmal Form (13.3, 16th) and Defense (26.7, 16th), illustrating how staying disciplined hasn't translated into results or defensive solidity, leaving their Overall at just 36.6.

Moreirense's Overall of 36.6 is dragged down most severely by dead-last finishes in both xG (9.3 vs. the league average of 32.8) and Set Pieces (20.0 vs. 51.9), two axes where they rank 18th of 18, offsetting their relatively mid-table Attack (40.0, #9) and Form (46.7, #8) and leaving them well below league norms across the board.

Gremio's 36.5 Overall is dragged down most severely by their xG of 20.7 (ranked 18th) and Set Pieces of 35.0 (ranked 19th), both far below the league averages of 47.7 and 66.0 respectively, revealing a team that creates dangerously little from open play and dead-ball situations despite a relatively respectable 7th-place defensive rating of 53.3.

Malaga's Overall of 36.4 is dragged down by bottom-ranked Attack (13.3, vs. league average 50.2) and Form (13.3, vs. 44.6) scores, making their Set Pieces rating of 75.0 — 5th in La Liga — a striking but isolated strength that cannot offset the team's near-total collapse in offensive output and recent results.

San Lorenzo's Overall of 36.3 is dragged down by historically weak attacking output — ranking dead last in xG (11.1 vs. a league average of 39.5) and 27th in Attack (13.3 vs. 40.5) — despite a genuinely strong Defense (73.3, 3rd in the league) that alone prevents an even lower score.

Marseille's Overall of 36.3 is dragged down by a Form rating of 0.0 (dead last in Ligue 1 at #18) and weak Attack (26.7, #15) and Defense (20.0, #17) scores, all sitting far below league averages of 43.7, 47.4, and 50.4 respectively, while their relatively stronger Set Pieces (57.5, #10) and Discipline (66.7) provide only modest uplift that cannot offset the damage across the other four axes.

Telstar's Overall of 36.1 is dragged down primarily by a league-worst Attack rating of 13.3 (ranked 18th of 18, versus the league average of 58.5) and an equally poor Form score of 13.3, which together offset their relative bright spot in Defense (46.7, ranked 7th) and prevent the team from rating higher despite being above average defensively.

Deportivo Riestra's Overall of 36 is dragged down by historically weak offensive output — ranking 27th in Attack (13.3 vs. a league average of 40.5) and 28th in xG (16.8 vs. 39.5) — though their Defense rating of 66.7 (10th in the league) shows they can limit opponents, creating a stark imbalance that defines their profile.

Getafe's Overall of 35.9 is dragged down by league-worst finishes in both xG (22.7, ranked #19) and Discipline (23.3, ranked #19), which overwhelm their sole genuine strength — a Defense rating of 73.3 that ranks #2 in La Liga and sits 28 points above the league average of 45.3.

Coventry's Overall of 35.3 is dragged down by historically weak attacking output (6.7, dead last in the Premier League against a league average of 48.7), but their Discipline rating of 76.7 — ranked 4th in the league and more than 10 points above the league average of 66.3 — stands out as the one genuine bright spot in an otherwise bottom-tier profile.

Banfield's Overall of 35.1 is dragged down primarily by a Defense rating of just 26.7—dead last in the Liga Profesional Argentina at #29 of 29, and 33.5 points below the league average of 60.2—an extreme defensive weakness that no other axis comes close to offsetting.

Jagiellonia's profile is defined by a striking tension between their league-leading xG rating of 82.7 (ranked 2nd in Ekstraklasa, well above the league average of 55.4) and their dead-last Set Pieces rating of 31.3 (ranked 18th, against a league average of 64.3), meaning their exceptional open-play attacking threat is significantly undermined by the worst set-piece output in the division, pulling their Overall down to 54.8.

Kortrijk's Attack rating of 13.3 is catastrophically low — ranking 17th of 18 in the league and sitting 34 points below the league average of 47.4 — making their near-total offensive absence the defining drag on an Overall score of 34.4 that would otherwise be modestly lifted by more balanced defensive and set-piece numbers.

Corinthians's Overall of 34.4 is dragged down by severe weaknesses across most axes—particularly Form (6.7, ranked #19) and Attack (26.7, ranked #18)—with Discipline (60.0, ranked #6) standing out as their only area near or above the league average of 55.8, making it the lone bright spot in an otherwise bottom-tier profile.

Konyaspor's 34.3 Overall is dragged down by weakness across nearly every axis, but their most glaring outlier is Set Pieces, where a rating of 29.2 ranks them dead last in the Süper Lig (#18 of 18) against a league average of 55.2 — a deficit of 26 points that, combined with bottom-tier xG (31.0, #16) and Attack (26.7, #14), leaves their lone relative strength in Defense (53.3, #7) far too isolated to lift the overall score.

Rio Ave's Overall of 34.2 is dragged down primarily by a Defense rating of just 20.0 (ranked 17th of 18, well below the league average of 55.2), with their xG of 15.7 also near the bottom of the league, leaving their Discipline score of 75.0 — ranked 2nd in the Primeira Liga — as a clear outlier that prevents an even lower Overall.

Utrecht's Overall of 33.9 is dragged down primarily by a Defense rating of 0.0 (ranked 16th of 18) and an xG rating of just 10.0 (ranked 17th of 18), both catastrophically below the league averages of 32.6 and 49.5 respectively, offsetting a near-average Attack of 60.0 and leaving the club among Eredivisie's weakest overall performers.

Osasuna's most striking anomaly is their xG rating of 56.0 (ranked 7th in La Liga, above the league average of 47.2), which stands sharply apart from their otherwise bottom-tier Attack (26.7, 16th) and Defense (20.0, 16th), suggesting they generate reasonable expected goal value but fail to convert that into results or defensive solidity, leaving their Overall at a modest 33.7.

Eyüpspor's Overall of 33.3 is dragged down severely by last-place finishes in both Attack (13.3) and Defense (0.0) — both far below the league averages of 48.5 and 47.4 respectively — with only their Discipline rating (79.2, 4th in the league) offering a genuine bright spot in an otherwise bottom-tier profile.

Union Berlin's Overall of 33.1 is dragged down by near-bottom rankings across most axes, but the one genuine outlier in their profile is xG at 61.3 (ranked 9th, above the league average of 56.7), suggesting they create reasonable scoring chances even as their Defense (0.0, 16th) and Form (8.3, 17th) make them one of the Bundesliga's weakest sides overall.

Hamburger SV's Overall of 33 is dragged down by catastrophic scores across most axes—including a league-worst Attack of 16.7 and a Defense of 0.0—but their Discipline rating of 79.2 (2nd in the Bundesliga) stands out as a genuine outlier, showing the team commits few fouls or receives few cards even as they struggle in every performance-related category.

Tupapa Maraerenga's Overall of 32.4 is dragged down almost entirely by rock-bottom Defense (0.0, ranked #8 of 8) and Form (0.0, ranked #8 of 8), which overwhelm the team's otherwise league-average or better performances across xG (50.0), Set Pieces (50.0), and Discipline (50.0), all ranked #1 of 8.

Genoa's Overall of 31.8 reflects a uniformly poor profile, but their xG rating of 19.7 stands out as their single lowest axis and a last-place ranking (#19 of 19) in Serie A, indicating that their attacking threat is even more severely underpowered than their already-bottom-tier Attack rating of 20.0 suggests, dragging the average down despite Set Pieces (50.0) and Discipline (61.1) offering modest relative stability.

Estoril's Overall of 30.7 is dragged down by historically weak offensive production—ranking dead last in the league in Attack (13.3 vs. a 42.6 league average) and 17th in both xG (12.0) and Form (6.7)—while their Defense (53.3) and Set Pieces (53.1) sit near the league median, creating a lopsided profile where defensive solidity cannot compensate for near-total attacking ineffectiveness.

ADO Den Haag's Overall of 30.7 is dragged down most severely by their xG rating of just 8.0 — last in the Eredivisie at #18 of 18 and far below the league average of 49.5 — indicating an almost complete failure to generate expected goals that compounds their already-weak Attack (40.0) and Form (13.3) scores.

Venezia's Overall rating of 29.9 is dragged down by bottom-of-league finishes on Defense (13.3, ranked #19), Form (0.0, ranked #19), and Discipline (46.7, ranked #19), but their xG score of 45.3 (ranked #9, near the league average of 45.6) suggests their underlying chance creation is far more competitive than their results and defensive record indicate.

Antwerp's Overall of 29.3 is dragged down primarily by a Defense rating of just 6.7 (dead last in the league, against a league average of 52.2) and a Form rating of 6.7 (17th of 18), two axes so far below even their own best scores—Attack 40.0, Discipline 50.0—that they single-handedly collapse what would otherwise be a middling profile into one of the weakest in the Jupiler Pro League.

Nacional's profile is defined by a stark paradox: they rank dead last in Defense (13.3 vs. a league average of 55.2) and last in Form (0.0), dragging their Overall down to 27.6, yet their Discipline rating of 83.3 stands as the best in the Primeira Liga — suggesting a team that commits few fouls but still cannot stop conceding or winning matches.