See the sources, not just the consensus.
Plus shows you the breakdown FDVS builds. Pro shows you the raw material it's built from — every one of the 40 tracked sources, individually, plus the tools that come with actually checking our work.
What Pro actually unlocks
The raw 40-source breakdown
Every consensus number on FDVS is built from up to 40 tracked sources. Plus shows you the blended result; Pro shows you each individual source's read, side by side, so you can see whether a 70% consensus is 40 sources in rough agreement or a handful of outliers dragging an otherwise split field toward one number.
Reputation-weighted community line
Community votes are weighted by each voter's own track record, not counted equally. Pro gives you that reputation-weighted line separately from the raw vote count — a genuinely different number than a simple popularity tally, and one that's tended to track results more closely over time.
Early-model refresh, before 6am
The public model refresh runs later in the day. Pro's refresh runs earlier — before 6am — so overnight line movement and early team-news are already reflected before most of the day's traffic even arrives at the board.
Exportable match reports
Every fixture's full breakdown — odds comparison, source split, market ratings — exports to PDF or CSV. Useful for keeping your own records, cross-referencing against a spreadsheet, or just not losing a specific breakdown once that fixture's kicked off and the board's moved on.
Plus vs Pro what actually changes
| Feature | Plus | Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus board & radar | Included | Included |
| Odds drift tracking | Included | Included |
| Source-level breakdown | Blended only | All 40, individually |
| Community line | Raw vote count | Reputation-weighted |
| Daily model refresh | Standard | Pre 6am |
| Match report export | — | PDF / CSV |
Common questions
Is Pro worth it if I'm already on Plus?
Depends on what you actually do with the board. If you mainly check the consensus number and move on, Plus already covers that fully. If you find yourself wanting to know why a number reads the way it does — which sources agree, which don't — that's specifically what Pro adds. It's a meaningfully deeper tier, not a slightly-nicer version of Plus.
What does "40 sources" actually mean?
FDVS tracks up to 40 independent inputs per fixture — a mix of statistical models, tracked prediction sites, and the reputation-weighted community line — and blends them into the single consensus number shown everywhere else on the platform. Pro is what lets you see each of those 40 individually instead of only the blended result.
How much earlier is the Pro refresh, really?
The standard daily refresh and the Pro refresh both run once per day, but Pro's runs before 6am rather than later — meaning overnight odds movement and early team news are already folded in by the time most people are checking the board for the day.
Can I export reports for fixtures I don't have a pick on?
Yes — export works for any tracked fixture's full breakdown, not just ones you've personally flagged or bet on. It's meant for keeping records generally, not tied to a specific action taken on that match.
Can I switch from Plus to Pro later instead of starting here?
Yes. Starting on Plus and upgrading once you've found a specific reason to want the source-level detail is a completely normal path — nothing about starting lower locks you out of moving up when it's actually worth it to you.
Why a consensus number isn't the whole story — and what Pro adds back
A single blended percentage is easy to read at a glance, but two very different situations can produce the exact same number — Pro is what tells them apart.
Every number on the fixtures board is a blend — up to 40 individual sources compressed into one consensus figure. That blending is useful precisely because it's simpler than the raw inputs, but simplicity has a cost: a 70% consensus built from 38 sources in agreement looks identical, on the surface, to one built from a bare majority squeezing past a large minority. Pro exists specifically to restore that distinction for anyone who wants it. Most of the time the blended number is exactly what you need; Pro is for the fixtures where knowing the difference actually changes how much weight you'd put behind that number.
Why source-level detail changes how you'd read a number
A consensus reading of 70% with near-unanimous agreement across sources is a fundamentally different situation than the same 70% produced by a slim majority — even though both display identically as a single percentage everywhere else on the platform. Pro's raw breakdown is the difference between seeing the destination and seeing the route that got there, and for a lot of fixtures, that route matters more than the headline number alone. A near-unanimous 70% is a genuinely stronger signal than a barely-there 70%, and only the source-level view tells you which one you're actually looking at, before you decide how much weight to put behind it.
Why the community line gets reweighted, not just recounted
A raw vote count treats every voter identically regardless of their track record — someone who's called fixtures well repeatedly counts the same as someone voting for the first time. Reputation weighting doesn't remove anyone's vote, it adjusts how much that vote moves the final line, based on how that specific voter has actually performed historically. It's a genuinely different number from a simple tally, not just a filtered version of it. Over time, a reputation-weighted line tends to diverge more noticeably from the raw count on fixtures where a small number of well-informed voters disagree with a larger but less consistently accurate crowd.
Why an earlier refresh matters more than it sounds
Football doesn't stop moving overnight — odds drift, team news breaks, injury updates land at odd hours depending on time zone. A refresh that runs before 6am captures more of that overnight movement before the day's traffic arrives, which matters most for fixtures where something genuinely shifted between the previous day's close and kickoff. For a fixture where nothing changed overnight, the earlier refresh won't show anything different — it only matters when something actually happened while most people were asleep. That's a narrower benefit than it might sound at first, but on the fixtures where it applies, it's a real one.
Who exportable reports are actually for
Export isn't built around any one specific use case — some people want a personal record of fixtures they followed closely, others want to cross-reference against their own spreadsheet, others just don't want to lose a breakdown once a match has kicked off and the board's moved on to the next day. The common thread is simply wanting the data in a form that outlives the live page. A PDF or CSV doesn't change once you've downloaded it, which a live web page inherently does as new data comes in — a small distinction that matters a lot if you're trying to compare what a fixture looked like before kickoff against what actually happened.
Pro versus Plus, in one sentence
Plus answers what FDVS thinks about a fixture; Pro answers what FDVS's forty individual inputs each think, separately, before they're blended into that answer. Both are legitimate ways to use the platform — Pro is for the specific moment you want to check the model's work rather than just read its conclusion, not a replacement for Plus so much as an additional layer sitting on top of everything Plus already gives you. Neither tier is "the real one" and the other a lesser version — they're built to answer genuinely different questions.
Starting on Pro versus upgrading into it later
There's no real downside to starting on Plus and moving up once you've found a concrete reason to want the deeper layer — nothing about the source-level breakdown or the reputation-weighted line requires a long history to make sense of; it's just as useful the first day you turn it on as it is a year in. Whether you start here or arrive after some time on Plus, Pro reads the same way either way, and nothing about your prior plan changes what you see once you're on it.